Video summary
In this comprehensive discussion, Annie Jacobsen details the current state of global nuclear arsenals and the mechanisms behind their management, noting that approximately 12,500 warheads exist today across nine recognized nuclear powers: Russia, the United States, China, France, Britain, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel. This figure is largely derived from data compiled by the Federation of American Scientists' Nuclear Notebook group, though Jacobsen highlights significant uncertainties regarding transparency, particularly concerning North Korea's undisclosed stockpile which estimates range wildly between 50 and 130 weapons. The conversation explores the concept of "launch on warning," a policy requiring the U.S. President to decide within minutes whether to counterattack before enemy missiles actually impact American soil. Jacobsen explains that once intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) are launched, they cannot be recalled or redirected; however, bomber forces like the B-2 and B-52 retain some recall capability, though their role is often moot due to flight times exceeding the window of a nuclear exchange. The dialogue delves into the technical specifics of the U.S. Nuclear Triad—consisting of land-based silos (400 across America), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) on 14 submarines, and bomber forces—and the command infrastructure designed to manage them. Jacobsen describes how satellite systems like SBIRS detect rocket exhaust in space within fractions of a second, transmitting data immediately to three primary underground command centers: Cheyenne Mountain, the National Military Command Center beneath the Pentagon, and the Strategic Air Command bunker in Nebraska. She clarifies that while these machines process data rapidly using AI-driven algorithms, human decision-making remains at the "glass floor," where only the President can authorize a launch order. The system relies on strict protocols to prevent accidental launches, such as requiring two silo operators with keys to input codes simultaneously; however, Jacobsen notes that if one silo is triggered in retaliation for an attack, all 400 are networked to fire automatically due to peer pressure and safety mechanisms designed to ensure a full response. Jacobsen debunks common myths about missile defense capabilities, specifically addressing the limitations of interceptors like those at Vandenberg Air Force Base and Alaska's system. She explains that these kinetic kill vehicles lack explosives and rely on high-speed collisions in space with success rates between 40% and 55%, making them insufficient against a massive barrage from adversaries possessing thousands of warheads, such as Russia's deployed arsenal. Furthermore, she discusses the devastating effects of nuclear detonations based on Department of Defense manuals, detailing how an above-ground explosion at roughly 1,900 feet maximizes blast damage while minimizing radioactive fallout compared to ground-level bursts that suck dirt and debris into the atmosphere. The discussion also covers "nuclear winter," a scenario where thousands of megafires loft billions of pounds of soot into the stratosphere, blocking sunlight for years and causing global temperatures to plummet by up to 40°F, leading to agricultural collapse and mass starvation affecting even nations uninvolved in the conflict. The podcast concludes with an examination of historical close calls and potential future risks, citing a famous 1979 incident where a VHS tape was accidentally inserted into early warning systems at Cheyenne Mountain, nearly triggering a false alarm that would have led to a retaliatory strike against Russia or North Korea. Jacobsen identifies the most dangerous scenario not as an automated system failure but as a "madman" launch by a rogue leader who does not adhere to international norms of testing transparency; she points to North Korea's recent unannounced missile tests and its refusal to follow standard protocols that other nations observe during times of tension like the war in Ukraine. Ultimately, Jacobsen advocates for de-escalation through open communication, drawing inspiration from President Ronald Reagan's "Reagan Reversal," where he shifted his stance on nuclear weapons after watching the film *The Day After*, leading to significant reductions in global arsenals and emphasizing that dialogue remains humanity's best defense against existential catastrophe.
Read the full video transcript
how many nukes are in existence right
now
12,500
approximately and where does that number
come from how do we know that that's the
number yeah well there are nine nuclear
armed Nations and the way we know the
specifics of them is thanks to a group
here in the United States called the
Federation of American scientists they
have a organization within that called
the nuclear notebook group led by a guy
called Hans Christensen and they do all
the counting for us the one variable
would be North Korea because they don't
have any form of transparency and so
it's guessing when it comes to what we
think North Korea has who are the nine
the nine are the obvious Russia America
UK France India Pakistan
China North Korea Israel Australia no no
wow how do we know that countries aren't
giving a United States
organization purposefully under reported
numbers to make us think that they've
got fewer that they've gotten rid of it
that they've de-escalated uh when in
fact they got loads well some of the
treaties uh which are like being
threatened right now ask for uh
transparency and also inspection and so
like for example people go to Russia on
our side and vice versa things can get
held up when there's direct conflicts
right like right now but it's amazing
you know in my book I I take the readers
from nuclear launch to nuclear winter
and I have these little sort of nerdish
History breaks where I give you some of
the details like this but mostly I stay
out of the policy both behind nuclear
nonproliferation and also the policies
that could lead to nuclear war because I
really want the readers to know like
this is what happens and the things
you're asking me are super important
because they have to do with sort of
preventative ideas you know this idea
that if we are more transparent with one
another and I'm talking about the
nuclear armed Nations there's going to
be communication on some level yeah it's
interesting I wonder I wonder if it's
true I wonder if 12,500 is the actual
number um you know it would make
complete sense he
we Cyber Sub auge and and and hacking of
chips and getting it like the most
obvious like the original scop
conspiracy lying like why not just lie
about it uh hide them put them in a
place that it's not like treaties and I
don't know when it comes to nuclear war
or the potential destruction of your of
your country something tells me there's
a lot of incentives to not be super
transparent I'll give you an example
North Korea the CIA will tell you that
North Korea has 50 nuclear weapons but
some private organizations some NOS
non-governmental organizations will tell
you that number is as high as
130 so that gives you an example of like
how how accurate that number may or may
not be 70,000 was the number we were at
when we peaked that's right
1986 right what happened to do do you
deconstruct a bomb do you do you sell it
for parts do you keep the depleted
uranium core to make a nuclear reactor
what do you do I mean what a great
question and what an interesting concept
of where does all that nuclear material
go um there's a plant in Texas called
pantex and that's where they do that and
it is so profoundly classified and not a
lot of people know about it and it's
almost certainly on you know everybody's
Nuclear Strike Target list because can
you imagine the Mayhem that would ensue
if you struck that there's just so many
prar iously dangerous situations it
feels like any sight that has to do with
anything that touches a nuclear weapon
becomes you know radioactive like
literally and
figuratively where are most of America's
nukes are they on land are they at Sea
have we got any that are in
space okay so I map out the Triad
America has what's called the Triad and
what a great place to begin because it's
like so much of what I try to do in this
book is demystify you know it's often
said here in America that the the
nuclear weapons belong to the to the
nuclear priesthood the PHD priesthood
right and there's kind of a an almost it
seems like a fool hearty attempt to keep
the laymen out to keep regular people
like you and me from really knowing
these things but interestingly when you
look at them they're very simple um and
because America is a democracy a lot of
our information is transparent so for
example the defense department puts out
a very thick monograph which almost no
one reads I have read you can read which
tells you exactly these numbers and it
explains what is called the nuclear
Triad and it's such an interesting place
to start and you realize actually things
are easier than you think nuclear Triad
oh3 okay so we have silos underground
silos we have a submarine force and then
we have a bomber force and the silos
they're there are 400 of them Across
America and believe it or not every
single one of them is targetable every
single one of them you can locate it
used to be on an old map now it's
GPS um then the submarines are just
crazy to learn about I mean they are
called the handmaidens of the Apocalypse
with good reason there are 14 of them
they're nuclear armed nuclear powerered
submarines satellites can't see them
they just cruise around underwater like
loaded with nuclear weapons each one has
as many as 90 and that's enough to take
out like not a city like not a continent
but arguably civilization because 90
nuclear weapons almost certainly sets
off nuclear World War III one does right
okay so then the last part of the Triad
is the bomber Force we have 66 bombers
those are the b2s that are very famous
that looks like a flying wing and then
the old school b52s and those drop
gravity bombs the interesting spooky
thing about that third part of the Triad
is that it's the only part of the Triad
the nuclear Triad that can be recalled
so it's almost certainly what the
president sends first in other words the
icbms the ballistic missiles that launch
out of the silos and the sub launched
ballistic missiles in the submarines
once they are launched they they cannot
be
redirected or recalled and so once they
launch that is
endgame yeah that's scary that being
said something tells me that using the
b52s and and the b2s uh you've got to
ready the pilots I I I have to presume
that you basically have a 247 crew of
nuclear missile carrying plane Pilots
permanently on base 24 hours a day 365
days a year and alarm goes off and they
are in the planes the planes are fueled
they're on the ground they're ready to
go etc etc I mean how long is it going
to take a a a plane to get from wherever
it is to to Moscow to be able to because
you got to be over the top of the target
if you're using gravity you've got to be
over the top of the target well you're
absolutely right and that's why the
bombers get sent first but they almost
will have no role and I interviewed
pilots who are who you know fly these
aircraft and who have trained for this
as you said constantly through across
all the decades that they have been in
existence and yet they almost certainly
don't play a role Because by the time
they would get to a target for example
we keep B the B2 bomber um very close to
Pyongyang right for this reason but very
close means 5H hour
flight and when you're talking about
nuclear war happening in seconds and
minutes not days not hours and weeks or
hours and days you know One Pilot said
to me the chances are you would you
would get there after the war has
commenced and you would have no way to
refuel in air because so many of these
aircraft need that capacity so you're
refueling capacity yes it is they are
all suicides Mission I mean nuclear war
is one b big giant
suicide you said I saw you write about
how Russian and Chinese submarines
regularly sneak up to within a couple of
hundred miles of the United States
coasts what was that thing about
something to do with the grapefruit on
the moon right right right okay so the
uh Michael con or Admiral Conor the the
former commander of America's nuclear
submarine force not somebody who usually
goes on the record or talks to
journalists he shared with me this
stunning analogy which is that it's
harder to find a submarine Under the Sea
than it is to find a
grapefruit sized object in space so
that's how stealthy submarines are and
yes thank you for noticing that detail
in the book because I was shocked to
come across in a defense department
budget request of all
things a map a sonar map demonstrating
the pathways of Soviet or sorry Freudian
slip there of Russian and Chinese
submarines coming up along America's
Coast just a few hundred miles out and
that is enough to keep you up at night
if all of the rest of it isn't what are
the most likely steps to a mistaken
nuclear war in your opinion well you
know M right so there's this famous
quote which I use
um whereby the UN Secretary General
Antonio gutterz says we are one
misunderstanding one miscalculation away
from nuclear apocalypse and so there are
there is a lot of room for error right
where you're you know there's a lot of
room for mistakes but there's also a lot
of room for
the madman
scenario um and that's what I use in the
book whereby a nuclear armed Nation
makes a rogue launch against the United
States for reasons that we never know um
that remains unanswered because the
world ends before anyone gets that
answer but it is according to sources I
interviewed a plausible scenario you
know a a nealis Madman with a nuclear
Arsenal so be it a mistake be it a
misunderstanding be it a Madman we are
really on the brink of catastrophe here
which is like I think the calling you
know the the sort of Clarion call to
have all of us talking about this thank
you for having me on your show because
your show is you know listened to by all
kinds of people not just policy wonks
and uh people that seem to be obsessed
with the sort of geopolitical maneuver
of everyone nuclear war you know it's
important to all of us well it's not
going to discriminate whether you're a
policy wonk or a defense department
person everybody's going to feel the
impact okay so someone fires a
nuke what happens from there take us
through the timeline from button of
first nuke gets pushed let's say that
it's from North Korea and it's going to
be aimed at the US yeah and this is like
this is that second by second
telling the T the the ticking clock
scenario that as I was reporting the
book initially wasn't sure how I was
going to actually like tell the story
and then once I began to really learn
the specifics of this it became
only the top the ticking clock scenario
because as you say it just it's a
sequence it just happens once nuclear
launch happens it all goes from there
and so the way it begins interesting
inly is in space and that is because the
United States has spent trillions of
dollars over the past
decades being aware of when anyone
launches a nuclear miss when anyone
launches a ballistic missile when anyone
launches a missile at all hang on hang
on what's what's a ballistic missile
what's what's a give me to give me the
hierarchy so and it's a great question
because you know we hear a lot about
strategic weapons versus tactical
weapons right so tactical nukes that's
what you hear Vladimir Putin threatening
now when he's talking about using a
tactical nuke that's that's a
battlefield nuke America doesn't even
keep them we did in the Cold War but
realized what a ridiculously bad idea it
is because it means you might actually
use them on the battlefield you know
you're just going upping upping the
scale you go from the mother of all
bombs to the nuclear tactical weapon a
ballistic missile is a weap a warhead
loaded on a rocket
that can travel it's called an ICBM
intercontinental ballistic missile so
that it can travel from one continent to
the other and it uses you know gravity
in as much that it has three phases okay
that's it takes 30 minutes three phases
boost phase five minutes midcourse phase
20 minutes terminal phase 100 seconds
that's from a Launchpad in Russia 26
minutes 40 seconds from pongyang it's 33
minutes I mean I geek out on the details
and have like you know professors of
math mathematics at MIT do the math for
me because you want to show how precise
this all is how specific the details are
that the defense department works on and
so these Satellite Systems in space it's
called cbers again analog you know
everything's in an acronym space based
infrared
satellite system cbers a constellation
of satellites in geosync meaning it can
park above an animation and watch for
the hot rocket exhaust on a ballistic
missile launch which it can see in less
than a fraction of a s of a second I
mean that when you really think about
that this all begins in the first
fraction of a second you understand the
depth and scope of what exists behind
the veil of the possibility of nuclear
warfare what happen so uh microsc after
the exhaust flares go off and it's not
even left the ground yet satellite
detects it presumably sends that to the
US what is the sequence of events that
occurs from a defense department
presidential perspective Y and it all
happens super fast so literally Within
seconds that data in space goes to the
command centers I was amazed to learn
that it goes immediately to three
command sistors and and again it it
becomes like very visual when you
realize how simple this all is the data
goes to you know Cheyenne Mountain we
know about this from movies it's in you
know it's like the the nuclear bunker in
Colorado beneath the mountain it's real
it's one of three the other one is
beneath the Pentagon it's called The
National military command center and the
third nuclear bunker is beneath stratcom
us strategic command that's in Nebraska
and the way it was explained to me that
like made it really easy to understand
Cheyenne Mountain is like the
brain the Pentagon is the Beating Heart
of nuclear war and the bunker beneath NE
Omaha Nebraska is the muscle and those
three command centers with their
Partners in the space force and at
various different command C centers
begin to interpret this data and so it
takes only 150 seconds from launch for
the machines people call them AI I call
them you know machine learning to start
calculating is that missile headed
toward Moscow or Hana Lulu is the
missile headed toward San Francisco or
is it headed toward the east coast and
100 50 seconds later that information
becomes clear and by then can you
imagine what has been going on in those
three command centers and all the
hundreds of thousands of people that are
working on this issue again behind the
veil 247 365 and so it becomes simply a
matter of minutes before the president
of the United States is notified about
all this and that comes to me directly
from two former secretaries of defense
here in the in the US who are saying
this is how it
works letting the president know that
very soon he's going to have to make a
decision about Counterattack about how
to respond and that sets in motion this
crazy policy called launch on warning
which requires the president of the
United States to launch nuclear weapons
in response to a rogue attack it's
called a bolt out of the blue attack
before nuclear weapons actually hit the
United States said differently we don't
wait to absorb a nuclear blow we launch
and that has to do with what we just
talked about the nuclear silos the
theory is that whoever is launching at
the United States will try and take out
the nuclear silos so we can't respond so
therefore we must respond which gets you
into this sort of orwellian
understanding of how orwellian all of
this is and by the way now I've only
taken you for through the first few
minutes okay the the language that you
used there you said that the president
will have to make a decision and that it
is kind of the President's duty to do
this launch on warning but all of that
stops at the glass floor that is the
president's right finger or or or him
saying yes or or in in the affirmative
type thing it seems to me like there is
still a human decision element of this
in the
US so it sounds like what you're saying
is that you believe that perhaps the
president would choose not to launch
nuclear weapons that it's not an
completely automated system absolutely
outside of the bounds of of human
decision that there is still a point at
which and maybe 999 times out of a
thousand the president would hit the
button um but that there is still this
kind of like arbitrary odd integration
of the president into the system
absolutely I mean it is not what is
called an executive order the launch on
warning is policy it's not an executive
order and and it is the president's
decision and only the president's
decision yet so if you had an incredibly
tempered
incredibly
peaceful uh incredibly fill-in-the blank
president who just simply was unwilling
to launch nuclear weapons you are
absolutely right interestingly you're
the only person who has who has posed
this it's the Brit it's the it's the
totally War cooked Brit in me that
doesn't want to have a a nuclear winter
so I had a guy called Andrew Bustamante
on the show who's excia his first job
was as a nuclear Silo operative yeah he
was one of the two guys with the keys um
I'm going to guess that you have worked
out about every hour round about on the
hour or so alarm goes off keys go in
code gets put in they have no can you
just run us through because that was one
of my favorite stories that he taught me
about how like willing denters and and
and stuff basically because of the
network of the 400 silos and they're
linked and you don't know if yours is
going on can you just explain kind of
how all of that works I'm sure I mean
listen I'm a journalist and the
firsthand witness is always better than
the secondhand Storyteller which is me
so I'm sure that his account of it is
riveting and I will watch it I have
spoken to misers who describe exactly
that and yes there are protocols in
place so that they don't make an error
so that a Mis
can can't go Rogue and decide to do
something but what there isn't in place
is a system in between the president and
the misier so in other words once the
President says once the president gives
the launch
order the the sequence begins there's no
descent there's no room for descent and
I asked the the Los Alamos classified
historian Glenn McDuff a variation on
your question to me like what you know
would we could we see someone refuse
whether it's anyone below the president
let's say even the stratcom commander or
down to the missier and he said to me
Annie I would recommend you'd have
better chances winning the Power Ball
yeah than to have someone in the nuclear
command and
control apparatus defy authority yeah so
what I learned from Andrew uh upon
issuing of in fact before we get to
issuing 400 uh missile silos is around
the US in each of those at all times
there are two operatives with keys
around their neck they have alarms that
go off uh firing alarms that go off
where they have to keys go in code gets
input they press a button that happens
about 24 times a day they have no idea
whether that is a false alarm or a real
uh Real World um like uh activity M also
if only one of the 400 puts the code in
and turns the key all of them fire
because they're networked together so
you need you would need to
have 399 and then one more willing to
centers you also have the peer pressure
of the other person with the key you
also have this sort of trained almost
like a a pavlovian response where we've
continued to do this and we've continued
to do this but one day you could get the
alarm come through you another day at
work put the code in turn the key and
then
he and go oh [ __ ] you have no idea what
you're aiming at you have no idea why
it's been fired you're just there to do
that thing and that that to me this sort
of distributed system if anyone fires
then all of them fire you only need the
code to go in into one of these silos so
yeah I think the the Power Ball analogy
probably probably stands
up those are some pretty incredible
details I'm going to have to drill down
on those because I'm not familiar with
them but that is kind of shocking okay
once you launch you can't recall is it
possible uh to intercept a nuke as it's
coming toward us I've heard about
Hypersonic missiles they sound faster
than icbms can we fire a thing at their
thing and knock it out the guy
interestingly an ICBM is Hypersonic
right so all of this business of
hypersonic is just in my opinion great
uh advertisement for the
military-industrial complex to have new
weapons um no one I know thinks
Hypersonic missiles have really much are
going to change much of anything in
terms of defense they're certainly going
to spend a lot more money for taxpayers
what is interesting that you pointed out
is about the myths behind the
interceptor program I myself was at a
dinner party when I was reporting this
book seated next to a very knowledgeable
person who when I said you know I'm
writing he said oh Annie you know we
have an Interceptor program for that and
I didn't want to correct him um there
has to be a female version of the
mansplaining concept I haven't figured
it out yet but I didn't want to correct
him I figured I'll just give him a copy
of my book because that is absolute
fantasy you know this idea that
America's Interceptor system is anything
like for example Israel's Iron Dome is
just simply not true we have
44 Interceptor missiles total four of
them are at vanenburg air force base in
Santa Barbara 40 of them are in Alaska
and they too are like ballistic missiles
okay so imagine Russia's 1,674
deployed nuclear weapons ready to launch
in seconds or minutes coming at the
United States up against 44 Interceptor
missiles
how presumably the Interceptor missiles
aren't under the same um restriction and
jurisdiction that the nuclear
disarmament slowly winding down your
thing consists of so if that's the case
why not just have like a million of them
is it are they costly is it hard to make
is it storage you're absolutely right
and inside of them the vehicle that
takes out the nuclear warhead by the way
is just a kinetic it there's no there's
no explosives in it it's simply hitting
it's an it's an object called an
exoatmospheric kill vehicle how's that
for a mouthful okay and that is just
simply going to
collide with the nuclear warhead one
hopes one of them by the way is going
14,000 mil an hour the other one's going
20 ,000 miles an hour this is taking
place 500 miles in space okay so even
the missile defense agency the the
spokesperson there said yes it is like
taking out a bullet with a bullet that's
their quote okay and the success rate is
between 40 and 55% so to answer your
question does it really make sense for
anyone to have you know thousands of
these on ready for launch status to
maybe
strike incoming War it's Madness all of
it it's insane and there has to be a
better solution than more weapons what
do you think would be the most likely
Target in the US is it take us through
triage the the the
targets and this you're talking about
for an enemy to attack us correct well
by all means the Pentagon is the first
and primary target and all almost
everyone who I interviewed for the book
said to me that it's the bolt out of the
blue attack against Washington DC that
Washington DC fears most that has to do
with the fact that it's not just that it
would
decapitate leadership and kill let's say
two million people if you had a one
Megaton thermonuclear bomb as I do in my
scenario but then you're setting off a
catastrophe of
problems having to do with what's called
continuity of government this idea that
the United States government must
continue functioning no matter what
imagine you know DC being decapitated
and so there's this incredible scramble
that I write about in in the scenario of
you know who's in charge and getting the
commanderin-chief out of Washington
DC you know the
targets are everyone it was said to me
this way by Professor Brian tun who's
one of the original five authors of the
nuclear winter theory he said if you
live in a major city or a minor City if
you live near an airport if there's an
industrial base in your city just about
any city in America up to let's say the
top 800 of them you have a nuclear
weapon pointed at you
that's enough to keep you up at night
and again the same goes for
anyone in a enemy or an adversary of the
United States that is also nuclear armed
they too have a nuclear weapon toun said
pointed at them but of course what he
really meant is targetable to them
because the nuclear weapons are actually
left uh targeted out at Sea in case
there was a rogue law
which I found like one of the only
comforting details in all of this and
when those keys get turn that's when the
codes the the the actual you know
coordinates um are put into play
what is the protocol that the the
president is chilling in the White House
answering emails on the phone Mr
President this missile is coming toward
us have you got any idea what the
process from there is
well I do because I interviewed many
people around the president that would
be confronted with trying to you know
make decisions about what happens next
so surely you would have his military
advisers at us strategic command and the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
trying to get a launch order in response
from him the Counterattack order and
that is something called jamming the
president and that is well known and
that is confirmed by almost all military
sources that they are very aware of the
launch on warning um protocols the
policy and that's what they need from
the president because the launch order
can come from him and only from him but
the most interesting sort of
counterargument that that would be the
primary event happening came to me from
the Secret Service from the the
president has a a paramilitary team that
is with him all the time this is not
very well known it's called the counter
assault team and they Shadow him
everywhere and they are responsible um
certainly in event like this for making
sure that he's whisked out of Washington
DC to safety that would be on the
command of the um of the person in
charge of the president's detail uh the
special agent in charge also known as
the sac and I interviewed Lou merletti
who is the head of the Secret Service
the sorry the director of The Secret
Service and before that he had been the
sack for President Clinton and he
explained to me that most certainly the
Secret Service would be completely at
odds with stratcom in that moment
because they would want to move the
president to ravenrock which is again
that sometimes mythical you know command
bunker outside Washington DC that is
very real and is actually called
officially the alternate National
military command Center because it is
where anyone left living who should have
been at the Pentagon would now go in the
event of nuclear war it's about 70 miles
outside of DC and it's a quick
helicopter ride if you can get there
before the EM pulse takes the helicopter
out are there any bunkers that can
survive modern nuclear
warheads almost none and certainly not
the ones that were built in the 1950s
you know the the ravenrock bunker the
Strat bunker they were like the specs
and again this is what's transparent
this is what is known on the record but
they were built to withstand a one
Megaton thermonuclear weapon but almost
certainly they would be targeted by 10
or a hundred smaller size nuclear
weapons which you know as I really nerd
out in the latter part of the book where
these Bonkers get destroyed you you
learn that they nothing can survive mult
being hit by multiple nuclear bombs
because the energy is spread out so you
know in such a manner that they just
simply can't survive and we haven't even
begun to talk about the problem of
losing electricity because people forget
that all bunkers run on generators and
eventually if there's no electricity
there's no way to Pump
Fuel talk to me about the different
types and sizes of bombs that have been
developed you know Oppenheimer just came
out and we got to see this very
impressive very scary explosion go on
and yet compared with what we have now
that's like it's like puny it's like a
stick of dynamite yeah atomic bombs are
so different than thermonuclear weapons
and again you know what a great question
because so many people don't know this
the nuclear priesthood has kind of you
know kept kept these kind of Layman's
details I think out of public
discourse the bomb dropped on Hiroshima
for example was 15
kilotons Nagasaki was 20
kilotons a thermonuclear weapon like the
one that's on the cover of my book that
is a photograph of the ivy Mike
thermonuclear device which was the first
ever exploded thermonuclear weapon it
was designed by Rich Richard Garwin who
I interviewed for the book he was 24
years old when he drew the plans he's
now
95 that weapon he explained to me was
10.4
megatons it exploded with the power of
almost
1,000 Hiroshima bombs exploding at the
same time from one center point of power
it is so massive it is five
miles of
fire and that says nothing of the blast
and the destruction that pushes out like
a bulldozzer in
rings at one point the Russians had a 50
Megaton weapon was that bomber yes it
was and you can look at those images
online and just be absolutely terrified
is this what's the difference between an
atomic bomb hydrogen bomb thermonuclear
Warhead what what's what I'm so glad
you're asking these questions because
these are like what keep keep people
from you know wanting to have this
discussion a hydrogen bomb is a synonym
for a thermonuclear bomb same thing
atomic bomb is the were the early fision
bombs and the thermonuclear and the
hydrogen same thing are used Fusion so
the way that Richard Garwin explained it
to me and again the smartest people in
the room can explain things to a child
because that's how smart they are and
that's how easy it should be and what
Garwin said to me was Annie keep in mind
that a thermonuclear bomb uses an atomic
bomb inside the weapon as a
fuse that gives you an idea of how much
power is involved yeah that's the
Striking pin the thing that pre viously
was the most destructive bomb ever
dropped on a city is the thing that
starts the thing that explodes you're
absolutely right okay so you mentioned
about this sort of five mile radius
let's say that oh actually that's a
question are these uh whatever they're
called above ground midair they do they
deploy in they hit the ground um so they
can deploy either place um the way to
kill the most people and that's a quote
from John Von noyman who Des who decid
was working on this issue uh with
Oppenheimer when they were deciding the
the Dynamics of where to detonate or
explode the bomb the Hiroshima bomb the
original bomb Von noyman the
mathematician figured out that you would
kill the most people if it was
1,900 ft above the target again what a
gruesome and mobra fact and
interestingly Von noyman was given the
Medal of Honor or I might be getting the
the title of the medal wrong but some
extraordinary prestigious medal from the
president himself for having figured
that out which is sort of horrific when
you really think about that um but that
is a very specific issue about killing
people because of course this is a
weapon of mass
genocide and if you explode it higher up
the blast will kill more people but if a
bomb is exploded on the ground you have
a whole different horrific set of
consequential deaths and that has to do
with radiation poisoning because when
the bomb explodes on the ground think
about all the dirt the earth that is
blasted up all of that is now irradiated
and all of that dirt is going to fall
back down to earth
irradiated versus the detonation that
occurs above the Earth will
essentially dis disperse into the
atmosphere and be taken away by the
winds which is why people can walk
around Hiroshima today it's why you can
go to the Nevada Test Site W so if if if
the Hiroshima bomb hadn't I didn't know
that it was an above air 1,900 feet
thing if that had exploded by hitting
the pavement Hiroshima would be
uninhabitable
for 2,000 years well not uninhabitable
but it would have a different the the
radiation would have a longer shelf life
right so like like I've been out to the
Nevada Tess site where a very
famous uh test was conducted in the
60s um and it it left behind what is
called the sedan crater it's such a
massive crater that it can be seen from
outer space and I walked Walked around
nearby it and so that was what 50 years
ago and it's no longer you know you can
stay there for a little bit of time but
you're absolutely right that there are
these radically different degrees of
radiation poisonings of Earth and air
dependent on atmosphere okay so a
standard Megaton thermonuclear Warhead
goes off 1 900 ft above a city what
happens directly below it 5 miles out 25
miles out 100 miles out talk me through
that in the book I use the one Megaton
thermonuclear bomb on the Pentagon
detonating above you know around a thou
a th000 feet above and the reason why I
do that is again because I can give the
effects to the reader not from Annie
Jacobson's imagination but rather from
act absolute specific
details sourced from defense department
documents called the effects of nuclear
weapons originally called army manual
50 because defense scientists have spent
all these decades since the Hiroshima
Nagasaki bombs and then through our own
atmospheric testing in the Marshall
Islands in the 50s the defense
scientists have been
documenting with great detail what
nuclear weapons due to people and things
in Blast areas going out and so to begin
with you have this thermonuclear flash
of light that is
180 million degrees at its center point
it's almost impossible for the human
mind to
comprehend that kind of power it's
equivalent to about four times the
center of the earth sun and so it sets
it just in a flash sets things a light
going 9 10 miles out I mean the defense
department knows in inches where pine
needles will catch on fire versus the
upholstery in car
seats and then of course so you have the
initial Fireball a one Megaton
thermonuclear weapon has one mile of
fire pure fire that's 19 football fields
everything is dead everything
there is nothing no cellular life exists
and outside of that you have you know
you you wish that you were at the center
point because outside in the next ring
going out you have you know melted steel
you have streets turning into molten
lava like you have people absorbing into
things you have permanent structures
changing shape and collapsing then you
have this bulldozer like blast that
moves out you have winds of 200 300 400
miles an hour a hurricane level wind is
90 miles an hour by the way um
everyone's on fire third degree burns on
people that aren't buildings collapsing
I mean shall I go on and horrify
listeners this is okay so how about this
as it was explained to me by a nuclear
engineer who studies this you also have
the issue of that mus you know when you
have seen an atomic explosion perhaps on
YouTube right from some of the early
tests that were done in the 50 you see
the mushroom stem and you see the
mushroom cloud well the mushroom
stem cre creates a sucking motion of
everything on the on its down on the on
the land below it so you have people
telephone poles cars
s people that have turned into
combusting carbon being sucked up in a
reverse sucking motion into that stem
well you've seen uh if you watch the
archive footage of of you know a house
that they've built out in the Nevada
desert or whatever you see things
go and then go back the other way there
sort of this and presumably that's the
sucking motion you're absolutely right
that is exactly what that is and so and
then the most haunting detail of all is
when you look at that mushroom cloud now
that you can see on YouTube You
Realize inside of that would be the
remains of people the remains of
civilization those bombs were exploded
out in the Marshall Islands on atoles
with no one around but you can imagine
what would be in that cloud stem and the
Cloud Cap if it were detonated over a
city yeah wow I mean
that's pretty one that's just one you
know in the scenario that I propose
there's more 1,000 or more that strike
the United States when it's endgame 72
minutes in and the same is over in
Russia and
so that begins nuclear winter which I'm
probably jumping to too fast because we
haven't even tell us about nuclear
winter well you know and I jumped there
because you can it was interesting
writing and Reporting this book and it's
been interesting the book has only been
out for a few days but hearing people's
reaction because most people read it in
one night I'm told right because or one
day because they can't stop reading and
it it is written that way because in the
most dramatic human
storytelling you know
possible manner I think you are like
what happens and yet you know what
happens but what happens at the end of a
nuclear war is nuclear winter and that
is because
after you get through the Fireballs that
we were just discussing the
blast the radiation
poisoning you have situations where
every single one of those ground zeros
becomes a mega fire so because that
tremendous x-ray flash of light that was
180 million degrees set everything on
fire those fires create more fires I
mean just imagine all the electricity
all the electric lines whipping and
connect and that are starting new fires
everywhere it's like thousands of
matches just fire after fire after fire
each ground zero will be between 100 and
200 square miles of fire as it continues
to burn and so multiply that by a
thousand by 2,000 around the globe and
what happens is you have
330 billion pounds of soot lofted into
the
troposphere and that is again not from
my imagination that is from
state-of-the-art climate modeling
done by Professor Brian tunon one of the
original authors of the nuclear winter
Theory along with Carl
Sean tune has stayed on this issue all
these decades since and and the the
climate modeling today shows us that
nuclear winter the predictions from the
80s when the theory first came to be
those were nothing compared to the truth
of it that the sun will be blocked out
by 70% or more from all that s
in the
troposphere and that the sun will be
blocked out in that manner for between
seven to 10 years is that globally that
doesn't stay locally globally because
the the atmos the wind moves and so
Nations that had nothing to do with this
nuclear war will be profoundly affected
and what ton explained to me is that
around the earth temperatures will fall
as as much as
40°
F large bodies of water in the mid
latitudes in places like Iowa and
Ukraine the bread baskets of the world
the large bodies of water there will be
frozen over under sheets of ice for
seven or eight or nine years and so
agriculture will fail and when
agriculture fails people starve to death
and that is why the number is now
estimated to be 5 billion people dead
after a nuclear
exchange is
that all
12,500 nukes is that 2,000 of them
what's the number that you need to have
launched to hit 5 billion in in the
scenario it's just a couple thousand in
the scenario I don't involve yet the
other nuclear armed Nations and I did
that on purpose because I was really
trying to demonstrate that after 72
minutes in the scenario as it was
explained to me and sort of you know
fact checked by the sources that I was
using and
others you at once you lose
electricity then you have no ability to
record history for the future and so we
never know if the other nuclear armed
Nations get involved so to answer your
question we don't know about the
remainer of the nuclear weapons and we
don't know about the thousands that were
in storage all it takes is the amount of
nuclear weapons that are on ready for
launch status right
now five billion people die in a war
between the United States and Russia set
off by a rogue nuclear nealis madman on
a bolt out of the blue
attack there's been a number of close
calls
in history some famous Ones guy a
submarine foil in the air the wrong VHS
tape being put in what was the closest
that we came to nuclear war in the past
in your
opinion I believe that it's the nuclear
test tape that you refer to and the
reason for that so just for your
listeners it was
1979 and this story came to me from a
firsthand witness former Secretary of
Defense Bill Perry himself he was on the
night watch that night the nuclear night
watch and he received
word that the Russians had launched
ballistic missiles at the United States
both land launched icbms and sub
launched slbms so this looked like a
massive you know first and second strike
attack and the information came from
both the nuclear bunker beneath the
pentag
and the nuclear bunker beneath
stratcom and so that idea which we
didn't get into but I take the readers
through in the book that you can have
the early warning launch the early
warning of a nuclear launch and that is
when the president gets advised but then
there has to be secondary confirmation
right so this 1979 error you're talking
about was moving toward secondary
confirmation because there was already
two bunkers confirming when suddenly
someone realized that it was actually a
VHS training tape a war game training
tape that had been
inserted into one of the machines at one
of those bunkers and as Bill Perry said
to me it looked real because it was
meant to look
real and so what was particularly
shocking to me about that and why I as a
journalist work with sources to help me
tell the story and convey the drama is
because when Bill Perry was telling me
that story it had been you know 40 some
odd years since it had happened and I
could hear it in his
voice the the terror and the almost
trauma of thinking that he was the
person who was going going to have to
wake up the president and tell him that
he was going to have to launch a nuclear
counter
attack well who starts one of these wars
given that it's pretty obvious How It
Ends like who in their right mind like
it's not just you you're a very good
journalist and writer but you know
there's hundreds of people in every
government around the world that's done
the war games that's played out the five
billion people and the nuclear winter
and the you know the pine trees on on
fire why would anyone start this given
what
happens and for that I looked to my
discussions with Richard Garwin who
designed the IV Mike thermonuclear
weapon who has been advising presidents
about nuclear weapons since the 1950s
who arguably knows more about nuclear
weapons and nuclear policy than anyone
on this Earth and it was Garwin who said
to me when we I was discussing scenarios
with him um because I made every I made
it very clear to all of my sources what
I was doing and I asked all of them if I
was fear-mongering and not one of them
said I was you know former Secretary of
Defense Leon Panetta said Annie I agree
with what you're doing the people need
to know but it was Garwin who when I
asked him what is the most dangerous
scenario that you could could think of
kind of like you're asking me you know
what kind of a crazy person would do
this we we have leaders that know and he
said that his fear was one nealis madman
with a nuclear Arsenal is all it takes
to start a nuclear war what does that
mean who is that I would think that is
the leader of North Korea today and I
believe that's who Garwin was referring
to and the reason for that is and the
reason that we're see
singular s the reason that we're sort of
using that
individual is because North Korea is the
only nuclear armed nation that doesn't
play by the rules I mean let's put rules
in air quotes right but there are some
rules of nuclear war one of which is you
tell people when you're going to launch
nuclear weapons and the and all of the
nine nuclear arm Nations do that and
when I'm saying nuclear weapons I mean
when you're going to launch an ICBM test
because you have to test your weapon
systems to make sure they work and so
all nations warn one another this is
something I just learned in the book
about North Korea by the way when I was
reporting it that for example during the
Ukraine war Russia didn't they they
canceled a pre a pre a test that they
had already had on the books they
canceled it the United States did the
same because no one wants to start a
nuclear war by accident particularly in
times of great hostility as is the world
right now because it would be
potentially mistaken by uh another
country as oh this might be coming for
Moscow or this might be coming for
Washington uh what they don't know is
it's going to land in the middle of the
North Atlantic and it's just a test
absolutely right I mean we talked about
that earlier with a 150c window between
if you're if you know or maybe it's
going straight up into space to deliver
a satellite so North Korea I learned
from the North Korea experts here in the
United States does not announce any of
its missile tests and since January of
22 they have launched 100 missiles
unannounced now I have spoken to the
individuals who have to run these
systems are in these bunkers do you know
what you imagine what must go on in
those first 150 seconds every time North
Korea launches that's happed that's
happened once a week for the last two
years it's happened a hundred times so I
guess since 2022 right um that is
reckless and that is why North K in my
scenario North Korea launches the bolt
out of the blue attack because they are
not playing by the rules they to them
the rules don't exist I asked one of the
experts why do they do that to show that
they have power to demonstrate that they
are outside the norm to demonstrate that
they are menacing and will do what it is
they choose to
do it's so infantile it's so juvenile
you think about North Korea it's such a
like stupid Petty like idiotic system so
immature uh I
mean yeah it's it it's just as well that
the uh citizens of that country don't
know just how stupid the people that are
running it are because if they did I
think they'd be even more ashamed of the
country that they live in but okay so
moving
forward what do you want to have happen
have you have you considered what a
safer world would look like is
deescalation realistic we went from
70,000 to
12,500
reported should we continue to dial that
down is there more policy that needs to
be in place what what do you want to
have happen in
future well that's the Reagan reversal
that we touched upon a little bit
earlier right I mean you think about me
as a high school student watching the
day after the ABC
miniseries um a fictitional story of war
between Russia and America a nuclear war
between those two countries
terrifying horrifying 100 million people
watched it but so did one very important
American Ronald
Reagan and he wrote in his presidential
Memoirs that he was greatly
depressed after watching that and he as
a result because remember you're too
young to remember but Ronald Reagan was
a hawk he was pro- nuclear weapons he
was working on SDI also known as Star
Wars to put nuclear weapons in space um
he believed in American Supremacy
through American Nuclear Power Nuclear
might and after watching the day after
he changed his mind and that famously is
known among DC insiders as the Reagan
reversal and that is why the world went
from 70,000 nuclear warheads to the
12,500 we have today because he reached
out to gorbachov to communicate and so
that's the answer to your question I
believe is called communication it's
called it doesn't make any sense to have
such animosity to have such enmity
toward you know anyone really but
certainly not your nuclear armed
adversaries because what is
really the worst case scenario scario as
a result of all that well read nuclear
war a scenario and you will see and so
you sure people may say oh Annie It's
pansy is of you it's so so naive to
think that
communication can get us out of the tree
but I believe that to be true I really
believe that if a if a if an subject as
significant as you know human existence
is discussed openly among people then
ultimately that issue Rises to the top
and you start having people in positions
of power like gorbachov and Reagan once
were to make
changes is it possible to still watch
that series that you're talking about is
that on YouTube or anywhere you can see
it on YouTube absolutely the day after
okay and by the way after the rovic
summit the White House called the
filmmakers and said you guys had
something to do with
this
wow wow Annie Jacobson ladies and
gentlemen Annie it's uh maab apocalyptic
uh but pretty important I think I'm a
massive uh I I have for a very long time
had a big concern about existential
risks and the fact
that nuclear war isn't a classic
existential risk permanent unrecoverable
collapse it's miserable and no one wants
to go through that and war is uh can be
done in a way which is a lot more
targeted so I really appreciate all of
the work that you've done the book's
fantastic where should people go they
want to check out more of the things
that you do
online my books are sold everywhere and
I read the audio of my audio books which
I'm told makes it a little bit easier
well you've got a fantastic voice so
yeah I uh I imagine it does I really
appreciate you I can't wait to see what
you do next thank you for joining thank
you so much for having me if you enjoyed
that episode you will love a selection
of the best clips from the podcast over
the last couple of months and it's
available right here go on give them a
watch