Video summary
In this podcast episode, James Bloodworth explores his two-decade journey through the manosphere and its evolution from niche subcultures into mainstream discourse. He notes that terms like "toxic masculinity" and "incel" have undergone a similar trajectory to the word "woke," becoming broadened labels used by media outlets such as *The Guardian* and *The New York Times* to describe anyone engaging in stereotypically male activities, from bench pressing to listening to Joe Rogan. Bloodworth argues that while these terms are often weaponized to discredit conservative viewpoints or associate individuals with extreme figures like Andrew Tate, the reality is far more nuanced; most consumers of manosphere content are critically engaged rather than radicalized. He emphasizes that focusing on sensational caricatures obscures the broader ecosystem involving pickup artists (PUAs), men's rights activists, and red pill communities spanning forty years. The conversation delves into how the manosphere has shifted from a focus on self-improvement to attract women toward resentment-driven ideologies centered on intra-sexual competition among men. Bloodworth explains that early PUA culture was often about learning social dynamics or overcoming shyness, whereas modern red pill rhetoric frequently frames masculinity as a zero-sum game where status is derived from dominating other men and viewing women as "status objects." This shift has been accelerated by social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok, which create an environment of constant visual scrutiny. Influencers exploit insecurities created by these algorithms, selling courses that promise to fix perceived failures in dating or life, often trapping users in a cycle similar to the self-help industry where blame is placed on the individual for not achieving results despite paying exorbitant fees. A significant portion of the discussion addresses the impact of changing economic and social landscapes on male identity, particularly regarding the traditional roles of provider and protector. Bloodworth points out that as women increasingly enter high-earning careers, many men feel a loss of status because these fixed societal structures no longer exist for them to rely upon. This cognitive dissonance can lead to resentment or adherence to extreme ideologies like the "80/20 rule," which suggests only 20% of men are sexually viable—a concept that permeates even Gen Z dating attitudes. However, he cautions against accepting these deterministic views as absolute truths, noting that while evolutionary psychology offers some kernels of truth regarding hypergamy (women preferring higher earners), the manosphere often runs with them to extreme conclusions that ignore individual agency and the complexity of modern relationships where women earning more than their partners is common and not inherently emasculating. Ultimately, Bloodworth advocates for a recalibration of masculinity away from deriving status from external validation or power over others toward internal comfort and genuine connection. He critiques the "negging" tactics prevalent in red pill advice that suggest withholding affection to maintain leverage, arguing instead that deepening relationships requires consistent effort and mutual respect rather than manipulation. While acknowledging that men naturally desire competence and being chosen by a partner, he warns against making this validation the centerpiece of one's life at the expense of other pursuits like career stability or personal growth. The episode concludes with an urgent call to address the mental health crisis among young men, suggesting that ignoring these issues will lead to further societal decline in birth rates and loneliness for both genders, necessitating a pivot away from toxic online echo chambers toward more constructive, real-world interactions.
Read the full video transcript
What wine are you drinking? That's what
I want to know.
>> Uh it's a rosé wine that someone we had
a a kind of small dinner party yesterday
and they left a bottle. So, uh it would
kind of be rude not to have it the next
day
>> on a Monday.
>> I know. But it's a Monday. I worked on
the weekend so uh I
>> technically a Friday.
>> Yeah, exactly.
>> Brilliant. Um I saw a a quote from
Richard Reeves earlier on today. I'm
worried that the term manosphere is
going to go through a similar journey to
toxic masculinity, simultaneously being
broadened massively beyond its original
parameters and breaking out of academic
circles and into mainstream discourse.
What do you think about that?
>> Yeah, I think that's a I like Richard's
work and I think that's a fair fair
point. I think I've seen the during the
course of writing my my book about the
manosphere, I've seen the term has
become uh very very uh baggy in terms of
how it's used. So, uh, I've seen I've
seen I've seen, you know, the manosphere
originally at least referred to, at
least in the book, it's kind of a it
refers to like male supremacist
communities, anti-feminist communities,
quite which is quite specific, I think.
But I've seen it over the course of the
the writing of the book, it's kind of
expanded to include almost, you know, if
you read the Guardian sometimes or New
York Times, it's like anyone who does a
bench press, anyone who can do a bench
press is part of the manosphere.
Um,
yeah. like Joe Joe Rogan is like uh the
part like he's that's kind of accepted
now in in the media that he's part of
the manosphere whereas I think well not
really maybe he's kind of people in the
manosphere listen to him but so do lots
of other people um so yeah it has become
so broad has become a little bit
meaningless the term toxic masculinity
uh yeah that that that kind of went
underwent the same thing even incel I
would say that term
>> uh yeah same trajectory just kind of
became this weapon in the hands of
people who would then use that to
prosize for their own sort of point of
view.
>> You know what I'm trying to think about?
I'm trying to think about an equivalent
sort of toxic negative term that's being
used for the female side of the fence
that's being captured by the mainstream.
If you were to look at some of the terms
coming out of the manosphere, stuff like
304s
um uh uh like um alpha widows um
so and then just every other sort of
slur like not very inventive slurs but I
can't think of I guess Karen in a way.
>> Yeah, Karen is probably closest. I mean,
trades a bit in in in in kind of
intellectual circles or if if you're
kind of reading Yeah. reading reading
New York the New York Times or something
or the Guardian again, maybe in those
circles, but not really it's not really
caught on in popular culture at all.
>> Yeah. I think an interesting place to
start actually is what the manosphere is
not. And you've kind of highlighted
there
guys talking on a podcast um may be
manosphere adjacent but if you again if
you broaden the term manosphere to
include anything that men like then like
roller coasters is the manosphere and
UFC is the manosphere and you know
Nickelback is the manosphere.
>> Yeah. Yeah, I mean it's it's it's it's
partly the fault of the term itself
because the term is just here if you
just heard the term manosphere and you
didn't know anything about any of these
subcultures that kind of claim that
mantle you you might think it's
something relatively benign because it
doesn't there's nothing in the name um
suggesting otherwise necessarily. Um, so
that that I think's part of it. But
yeah, I mean it's just these terms do
get lazily applied to a politic like
woke is woke is an example on on
>> you have kind of people on the right
will call anything they don't like. Oh,
this is just woke
>> and it's just kind of a label to
associate your opponents with kind of
>> the worst aspects of something. So like
the the the crazy like hyper identity
politics people
>> whereas yeah if you
>> people who want to discredit kind of any
conservative politics will say well
that's just part of the you know the
manosphere and
>> and
manosphere red meat is manosphere
wearing body spray.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Anything is um I mean that
this was worse I think a few years ago.
So I think people like Richard Reeves
have allowed us to have a more of a
intelligent conversation. I mean in the
mainstream that is I think there's like
the the media media ecosystem now is
obviously much more um broad and and
there are all kinds of different
conversations but in the mainstream
people like Richard Reeves I think have
made it a bit more cringe to just throw
around terms like toxic masculinity um
you know everywhere. I I hear that term
a lot less now. I didn't use it in in
the book, you know, deliberately because
I think it's um unhelpful, but I think
Manosphere um yeah, I mean, I hope it
doesn't stop getting used just yet
because it's it's the subtitle of my
book.
>> Yeah, I I hope it doesn't I I it does
annoy me if I see it just kind of thrown
around. Um yeah, about just like guys
just doing like guyish things. Um, yeah,
>> it's a it's an interesting one because
memes catch on because of how
sticky they are and unfortunately that
can cause them to kind of have a really
short shelf life. I I often think about
to use woke, I think about political
correctness and you know that was kind
of a a highly uh thrown around term and
then it became a meme pretty quickly and
the [ __ ] speed of evolution from woke
being an unironic term to satarized out
of existence was a nancond. you know, it
it basically never existed as an
unironic term and I think the manosphere
actually actually got to. So, it's
interesting to say that you've seen a
downturn in conversations about the
manosphere because then adolescence came
in at the start of this year and I I
feel like that kind of really exploded
and kicked off this conversation again.
>> Yeah. I wouldn't say I've seen a
downturn in um conversations about
manosphere necessarily. I think the last
few years there's been an uptick in
conversations about specific
individuals. So Andrew Tate for example
and there's been there's been kind of a
similarly with with use of the term
woke. So uh the woke took on this kind
of caricature and then no one was
actually interested in looking at where
it came from the where the movements
came from. It was just became this kind
of term of abuse to associate people on
the left with the most extreme elements
of the hyper identity politics stuff.
And and you've seen kind of the
manosphere be used in a similar way or
is being used in a similar way where you
you have people progressives sometimes
or ostensibly progressives who will try
to throw that at anyone you know right
of center or anyone just yeah doing kind
of quote unquote manly things to try and
associate them with the extremes like
Andrew Tate um or whatever. I think that
the conversation on the manosphere has
manosphere has become more part of like
the mainstream culture that conversation
but it's very much focused on these kind
of very caricature individuals. So
Andrew Tate would be the the obvious
example of that. Before it was the
incelss. You know there was a slight a
bit of a moral panic around incelss
around 2018 19. Jordan Peterson another
one. But my book is really looking at
how the manosphere is this kind of much
bigger 30 40year thing going back to
pickup artists um men going their own
way men's rights activists. There's a
whole like basically um ecosystem. Um
whereas the media now it tends to just
present the most uh sensation the
sensational basically big personalities
I would say.
>> How do you come to think about the
phases of the manosphere? I have a um
relatively white pill hopeful uh way of
of piecing it together. But how do you
think about the different epochs that
got us to where we are now?
So, I mean the the the initial kind of
manosphere really. I mean, you have guys
before the advent of the internet. Ross
Jeff is the a guy you might have heard
of. Um the inspiration for a Tom Cruz's
character in Magnolia. Um I'm not going
to say the line. Um now slightly
overused uh line, but Ross Jeff um Eric
a guy called Eric Vber. These these guys
kind of selling their books out the back
pages of men's magazines and stuff. Then
the internet in in the early 2000s, late
late 1990s. The internet is where you
really see the rise of the pickup artist
community as chronicled by Neil Strauss
who you've had on your program um before
who's who kind of yeah that the the game
was like a huge huge selling book and
the pickup artist kind of community in
the 2000 late 2000 uh late 2000s early
2010s. it kind of morphs into the red
pill community or kind of splits and so
you have the red pill community the
incelss becomes much more political much
more conspiratorial much more based
around kind of resentment so the pickup
artists you know for all their flaws it
was kind of um we you know I want to get
a girlfriend or there was a lot of guys
attracted to it like just want to kind
of learn a few lines yeah there was a
lot of manipulation involved but then
the red pill movement it really is like
trying to get back at women in in some
kind of cosmic way. So, it's videos
about uh you know, berating women kind
of the the dunking on women economy kind
of emerges if you like. Um the the
original guys, it was about kind of
shaping yourself to be what women want
or are sensibly what women want. Whereas
a lot of the guys today, a lot of the
Red Pill guys, it's more about shaping
yourself in some ways for the male gaze,
for like what you think what what to
impress other men. So having the kind of
harum of women or being alpha and
intimid making other men feel kind of
uncomfortable dominating every social
interaction you're in. Um so it's it's
quite different in some ways but there
is that kind of thread running through
it of this very kind of rigid view of
men and women as almost like you know
from Mars and Venus as separate species
etc.
I think at least in retrospect the
pickup industry seemed to kind of
pathize kindness and empathy in men.
>> Yeah.
>> How do you think that impacted the
trajectory of male female relationships
especially given where we're at now with
the the complaints that each side has
about the other?
>> Yeah. Yeah, I mean there was a sense
that yeah, there were certain behaviors
that many many men found the pickup
artist community and they they behaved
in the stereotype is often wrong about
those people. They were not um these
very aggressive guys. They were often I
mean there were those sometimes but they
were mostly the ones I the guys I met in
that scene. They were they were mostly
guys who really did need to be told to
be a bit more assertive. So they would
>> is like 5'6.
>> Yeah. And and and there was that aspect
of it. It wasn't just um these men who
just wanted to manipulate women into
bed, although again there is there was
that element. There was a lot of men who
kind of didn't they were ashamed of of
being masculine. They were ashamed of um
taking up space uh in the world. And
yeah, that that that was a big part of
what attracted to lots of men to
community. But then they would often put
on a costume, if you like, put on this
kind of masculinity costume, which would
be completely the other way, like a
cartoonish um thing where yeah, you
never show any emotion. Um well, I mean,
they didn't really say that quite so
much. That was a bit more the red pill
stuff a bit later.
>> Um like never really show any emotion.
um which is by the way is a terrible
thing to well it's actually never show
any emotion unless it's anger which some
for some reason didn't count as an
emotion but I mean that's a terrible way
to um form a to behave in a relationship
I think um but yeah there was there's
kind of a lot of guys kind of going
going the other way um with that and
that thread kind of got even more kind
of in the red pill community and what we
see today that stuff has got even more
like entrenched so it's like they
doubled down on it now so well if this
isn't working. It's just cuz you're not
being alpha enough. And yeah, it's it's
kind of it's a lot darker now than it
was when when I kind of first discovered
the pickup artist in the mid-200s.
>> I mean, that says a lot that you
consider the pickup community to have
been more sanitized than the modern
manosphere. You sort of talk about uh an
increase in vitriol and victimhood in
the modern version. What do you think
caused the manosphere to get harder,
more spiky, more political as it went
along?
>> Yeah. So, I mean, I do I don't want to
sanitize like the pickup community, but
it's it's ironic in a way that that when
>> talking relatively here.
>> Yeah. said, "No, of course." But it's
ironic when I look back on so Mystery
was the was the main pickup guru in the
2000s and um and you know the the main
character in Strat's book, he would kind
of talk about how you know she's not a
[ __ ] she's just a [ __ ] to you. So it
was basically what you're doing is why
she's being rude to you. Whereas that's
really nowadays it's kind of like oh
well uh it's because she's hypergamous,
you know, fickle. uh she just sees you
as kind of a a loser. Mystery and those
guys used to peacock um was the term
where they'd go out to the club in like
ridiculous outfits uh top hat, goggles,
eyeliner and nowadays if if you know the
the red pill guys, you know, the men
wearing eyeliner is the problem because
it's the kind of the collapse of like
gender norms
>> participating in the fall of Western
civilization. Um so yeah, I mean why did
it get darker? I mean partly I think
after Neil St's book you had you had all
these people in the community kind of
masculinity entrep pickup entrepreneurs
who it became this this very much this
[ __ ] show of
>> social dynamics was one of them.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And and guys getting ripped
off um like paying these paying these
guys who would just take them out to a
club, point at women for them to
approach, which anyone could basically
do and call themselves a a pickup guru.
and then they'd come away and they
didn't have the supermodel that was like
promised to them uh by these gurus often
get get angry and and that was kind of
how some of the incel movement started
like anti- pickup artist uh websites
where guys who'd been ripped off or felt
they've been scammed and they said you
know game doesn't work and and then they
started to go down this much more deeper
rabbit hole of very determinist thinking
that
>> if you're not like if you're not seven
foot with like a a square jawline and
you're you're forever alone. You're
you're genetically you're genetic trash
or or whatever. Otherwill guys, I think
it's just to kind of add quickly. I
think the red pill stuff I think social
media has been made a big difference to
that. So, we've we've kind of now that
we all have short video and and photos
kind of on our smartphones. I mean,
short video in particular, you have it's
kind of universalized that that kind of
resentment that you're not having as
much sex as other people. or you're not
living you're not kind of living as fun
a life as other people that sense of
pulparization and I think there is that
more generalized resentment now which
you also see in the manuscript
>> I wonder whether part of it in the past
would be because the internet and your
looks didn't follow you around in the
same way when Neil Strauss and mystery
were doing their thing in 2006
that all that you needed to do was
something that was effective to get your
end goal which was to get laid with
women. Whereas now, because of the
ubiquity of Instagram, your personal
brand, your visual identity is
scrutinized not just by women, but also
by other men. So, by design, you're
going to inevitably have to sort of uh
move toward, well, where is most of the
criticism going to come from? Well, any
guy that spent even a modicum amount of
time in the gym knows that the first
people that notice that you've got
bigger from going to the gym are not
women. It's other men. And the same
thing goes for the way that you dress.
And the you know intraexual competition
is way more salient to both sexes even
more to women actually than to men. But
intraexual competition is way more
salient than interexual competition. And
you know in order to get a girl to
notice you what is it how many swipes uh
men go right versus women go right. Like
most men largely are at least visually
invis invisible to most women. But most
men are not invisible to most men. like
we see our competition and we use that
to judge where we are in the status
hierarchy. So I wonder whether the sort
of pivot toward a more classic hyper
masculine approach as you say is not for
the benefit of men toward women but for
the benefit of men toward other men.
>> Yeah, I definitely think that's um
that's plausible. I think that's that's
definitely plausible. I think also looks
in some way have become more of a status
symbol in their own right. So we have
become a more look society. So the
critique of some of the incel groups um
of obviously they go right off the deep
end and and adopt this very nihilistic
worldview but we we are a much more look
society and we seem to become a much
more look society like with every
passing year. is I mean even if you look
at like if you if you arrived on planet
earth for the first time and looked at
kind of music or films you you you would
assume that that to be to musical talent
kind of a prerequisite for that was
being really hot. You would assume um I
mean when I was a kid Christopher Reeve
in in Superman was kind of yeah he's a
fairly he's he's he's a fairly trim guy.
He's in shape and stuff whereas now it's
like Chris Hemsworth
>> not Henry Cavll. Yeah. No, the yeah the
kind of the the the bodies have become
like more extreme. There is more
pressure on boys to aspire to a more
Yeah, I mean in some in some of those
cases, yeah, it's actually an
unrealistic ideal unless you're just
working out as a full-time job or
juicing, you know, juicing as well.
That's I I find it hard to see that
there's no correlation between that and
the fact that you have 13y old boys
taking steroids now, whereas that was
not that was that was completely unheard
of really when I was younger. Um
>> yeah, you uh you dug into the
relationship between gym culture
training. Uh wow, a second glass of
wine. Let's [ __ ] go. James Bworth,
this is a Monday, dude. I love this.
I've got so much freelance lifestyle.
>> I've got so
>> I don't do this every I don't do this
every Monday. Do we need an
intervention? Um,
>> not yet.
>> Yeah. Talk to me. Talk to me about gym
culture.
>> Yeah. I mean, I I I gym culture I know
more just from going to the gym.
Although when I was writing the book, it
didn't I didn't go as much as I I would
like. But you do have I mean online you
do have uh fitness influencers sometimes
um who will will talk a good game about
the thing they know about the gym, about
why you should what you should do in the
gym and your routine and your diet and
stuff. But and then people will kind of
accept them as an authority figure
because that's often how those
relationships work online now. um you
you have your kind of guru in some ways
but then they will kind of start talking
like Andrew Tate I spoke to someone who
discovered him through um kickboxing so
he was getting into this stuff was
watching YouTube videos and it was like
this guy was very charismatic knew what
he was talking about and it even takes
like when he doesn't know what he's
talking about he speaks with that kind
of force multiplier of of conviction
which makes you kind of that charisma
you kind of drawn in oh maybe what this
guy's saying is right Trump funnily
enough is someone who als so has that
kind of frame control. Um, and then he
said, you know, this Tate would talk
about this stuff and then he started
talking about, you know, he'd he'd
pepper in like um sprinkle in like stuff
about feminism, about how the sexual
revolution has like ruined it for men
and if you're not part of like the the
80% of uh the 20% of men, you're just
going to be left behind and and all of
this stuff. You've got to lie. You've
got to present this uh you know,
ostentatious lifestyle to the world or
you're never going to get a partner. So
there's a lot of kind of the way we the
way we get information now is not
through institutions so much it's
through influencers and sometimes you
know they have their area of expertise
but then maybe they're not the right
person to listen to on this other thing
but it's very easy to fall down that
kind of silo where you have your kind of
figure and then yeah I mean that's
that's tape that's a classic one with
tape with his with his gym and
kickboxing um but then kind of
sprinkling in some of the other stuff.
>> I uh I I see this in myself. I see this
in myself. I see this in my friends. The
allure of starting to get out over your
skis. Um, nobody is an expert in that
many things. And um,
>> but it's hard not to talk about it when
you're asked. Like, yeah, I completely
uh completely see that.
>> It's [ __ ] seductive, man. Like,
people care. People care about what I've
got to say about evolutionary
psychology. Why shouldn't I Why
shouldn't I comment on the Ukraine?
>> Why shouldn't I Why shouldn't I comment
on the Middle East? I I think I've got a
really interesting take on immigration
that people should should hear. And um
there's an idea, I only learned this a
couple of weeks ago, um jesters
privilege. So the idea that court
gesters in the Middle Ages were
permitted to say things that other
members of the aristocracy, other
members of sort of the the ruling class
would have been [ __ ] hung for. And I
guess if you push it too far, then the
jester would probably get hung as well.
But that there was a degree of um
additional leeway that was given there.
Uh, I certainly know that there is kind
of like a bros privilege that I'm able
to wave or comedians privilege that
Rogan and and his boys are able to wave
as well. Like, ah, you know, if you're
coming to me for your advice about
[ __ ] epidemiology or whatever. Um,
and I do get I look, I understand that
this sort of gateway content crank
magnetism pipeline thing. I understand
that that's a concern for people. I have
a little bit of a I have a little bit of
a problem with too many accusations
around that. Specifically when it talks
about jumping you from creator to
creator. Um so for instance if you start
listening to Jordan Peterson telling you
to clean up your room and then whatever
the stat is within 15 minutes of
scrolling you're delivered an Andrew
Tate video and then you know within five
videos of his first video about
kickboxing it's a video about this
thing. I it doesn't to me feel like it's
the fault of Jordan Peterson that Andrew
Tate gets delivered to him. I that seems
like an issue of algorithm, not of on
the creator. The same thing goes for me.
I don't get to choose what the video
below this one is. The algo hopefully
it's another, you know, fantastic
conversation like our last one that we
had three years ago. Um but we don't get
to choose that. So, the the kind of like
pipeline thing, the um the gym is a
gateway drug to right-wing
radicalization,
the watching of, you know, you watch UFC
knockout compilations and before you
know it, you you're dawning a [ __ ]
KKK hood. Like, all of this stuff,
>> yeah, you're you are you're paying for a
[ __ ] drop shipping course.
I I'm real hesitant around around
whose feet do you lay the responsibility
of that because it's not Jordan
Peterson. No, no, I wouldn't I wouldn't
say it was was the fault of the
individual creators. It's it's that's to
do with the tech companies and the
algorithm. Um that's that's very much
not um Yeah, I I would absolutely say
that's not the fault of someone like
Peterson. I think I think with with
Peterson the more interesting thing is
kind of his views have changed a lot in
since when I first came across him in
like 2018. Um I I have a lot of good
things to say about Peterson. There's a
lot there's a lot I think is about his
message which is countercultural in a
way that is not just like it's not just
something that conservatives can be on
board with. his kind of that you should
not just always take the path of least
resistance that we live in a society
that's kind of satiated with um
advertising telling you you know watch
watch the pornography you know play the
computer game just just kind of what
feels
>> do yeah do the thing that feels good
whereas he comes along and says actually
no do the thing that's painful because
after you've gone walked through the
fire you'll feel better than you would
have ever felt by just taking the kind
of consuming the cheap kind of the cheap
kind of sugar high um which that was a
That's a really counterultural message
in a way. That kind of aesthetic um just
not being kind of buffeted around in the
breeze by kind of all these kind of all
these interests basically telling you
that you need to buy this thing that you
know oh you know [ __ ] with your
dopamine and saying you know watch oh
look at these Instagram models on you
know you scroll through the grid and
stuff but just kind of follow your own
path. That was that was very powerful
but his views are kind of yeah maybe I
don't want to listen to him when he
talks about like the COVID vaccine for
example.
you know there's there's kind of there's
there's kind of a
>> I think sometimes but that's also
there's the responsibility if you like
on the audience I think as much as
>> as as much as the creators because
>> such
>> like critical critical thinking you know
they're not just
>> you know it's it's you know follow those
who what is it that's that old saying
follow those who seek the truth run from
those who claim to have found it like
like actually you know evaluates people
critically even the people you who make
sense when they talk about like the gym
or something or or Jordan Peterson, you
know, take what what works and discard
what doesn't.
>> This is an area of um
sort of very patronizing, very actually
sort of patriarchal, like parochial view
of what an audience member is that it it
treats them as totally [ __ ] passive.
Like, oh
>> yeah,
>> poor like simpletons. you are unable to
discern for yourself whether or not this
person is chatting [ __ ] or is in a
domain of competence that you should
listen to. Please allow us to step in
and st sanitize or sterilize whatever it
is that's going on with this. It's like
dude, the people that listen to shows
like this one or like Jordan's stuff or
even the people that consume except for
young kids I understand when you get
below 60. I mean prefrontal cortex for
men, mine at 37 I think is still
developing. Um
there are lots of people who are able to
discern for themselves whether or not
this person is adding value even if
they've added value in the past in a
different domain etc etc. I I'm hesitant
around saying you know this person is
just able to pipe beliefs directly into
the prefrontal cortexes of of of the
people that are watching.
>> Yeah. I mean it can be that that that
argument. I remember even when I was
back at college doing like sociology
there always there was always kind of
the the theory of media there was always
some theories which were just too crude
that that like false consciousness can
be can be like that that well they just
don't know what they really think cuz
cuz from that then you can elect
yourself as like a vanguard a group of
kind of political thinkers well we know
what's better from those for those
people than they actually know
themselves which can get into quite
dangerous political territory at least I
think I think with the thing is with the
internet and influencers and just this
glut of information. I think what's um
so so during the manosphere research,
one of the things all of them talk about
a lot is like social proof, like status,
social proof. And it's it's one of their
concepts which you know has some some
truth to it that if you're and and not
just in the sense that like if you have
a guy who's surrounded by women, other
women often find that that guy more
attractive. But even just like why do we
buy the Coca-Cola if we know nothing of
Coke? Why do we buy the Coca-Cola over
the own brand cola? And it's kind of
like it's a way of making a decision
really quickly that well all these other
people have bought this so I'm just
going to buy this or like a celebrity
endorsement or something. And with with
the kind of the way there's so much
information on the internet now, I think
sometimes our brains kind of defer to
just looking for the status or clout
that a person has like the the number of
tributes and likes that people are
paying to them. And just a kind of way
to cut through the influ the blue check
mark is is another kind of example of
that stuff. Whereas it's kind of not
always the best way to I mean it's not
just with with influences, it's just
everywhere. It's not always the best way
of making a decision that you trust
someone more just because they have more
kind of clout. And I think online it
gets into particularly perilous uh
waters where people can gain clan for
kind of all kinds of stupid things like
um you know there are there are kind of
a lot of influencers now and there are
people like Tate I think just saying
really outrageous things but then the
kid who encounters him when he's got
like 3 million followers or something he
may he you know he may not have seen all
the other things but it's like oh well
you know your brain kind of oh I see the
three million followers I'm going to
listen to this guy more than kind of the
person maybe maybe Richard Reeves you
know who doesn't have as many followers
but is going to
a much more substantive message. I think
that's an issue with the internet and
the way our kind of brains work and and
try to filter information quickly
because we haven't got the time
obviously to judge everything on its
merits.
>> Mhm. Yeah. What are the what sort of
people are the lost boys? Who is it that
you think are the audience members that
are being spoken to?
>> Uh I mean all kinds of all kinds of
boys. So, I mean, when I was 22, 23, I I
went on a pickup artist boot camp, uh,
cuz I was, uh, yeah, like 20 years ago
this year. No, 20 years ago next year,
in fact. Um, I was just like
very shy, lived in the countryside, went
back to college, thought it would fix
all of my problems, and then realized
like there's still this kind of
unbridgegable gulf between me and this
this girl I liked. And it's just I don't
know what. Never had a dad growing up.
Uh, but then again, I don't know if that
would always be helpful in that respect
because my friends never ask their dad.
They'd rather die than ask their dad for
like dating advice. But I had these
issues around like what the hell do I
do? I felt kind of locked into myself
when it came to that stuff. And so, you
know, there were there were gurus on the
internet who promised to have all the
answers and that was like very appealing
to me. Uh, other guys I met is like they
just yeah, they just wanted a few
pointers in that in that space kind of
kind of like where I came from. Then the
more you hang around it, the more you
kind of start to absorb the the real
like ideology behind it. The more you
start your interactions become kind of
more salesy and manipulative. Like you
meet those guys and they've been around
it for a few years. It's like talking to
kind of an insurance salesman or
something. Everything is kind of
monitoring all the variables when
they're talking to you. Other guys just
like they had abusive parents. Uh I'
I've met met guys who uh they they felt
like they were never they were never
enough for their parents. like they they
always felt diminished as being kind of
uh soft like guys like their their
stepfathers bullied them, their mothers
bullied them. Um so you have that. You
also did I did meet guys who were just
like manipulative and wanted to
>> they had they had an issue with women to
start with and it just made them a more
effective like manipulator. So that was
why they grow. It's like there was all
sorts of people. There wasn't really a
type. Um, often though the thing the the
thing with with the the newer influences
in the manosphere is they would they
like we said we often talk about
radicalization like what was the
vulnerability which kind of made someone
susceptible to that content and that's
that's like an important conversation
whether it's manosphere, Islamism, far
rightly whatever that's an important
thing but the the difference now I think
with social media is often the the the
insecurity is almost created by the
creator themselves in some ways. So, you
have like a 13-year-old kid who, you
know, is is on social media or
something. And is seeing like seeing
these influencers say, you know,
propagate the 80/20 rule that that we
live in this post- monogamy society
where you're never going to get a sexual
partner, you're never going to get a
girlfriend unless you kind of conform to
this very narrow stereotype of what like
an elite man, like an alpha male is. and
and then these guys come along and then
then present themselves like diminish
the person, say, "Oh, you're just a
yeah, you're just a beta soy boy." Um,
and and really kind of knock their
confidence down and kind of like in like
a c and then come along, present
themselves as like a savior and guide
and you buy if you buy my course for
10,000 $10,000, I will fix you and I
will, you know, there's one guru in my
book who says, you know, uh, this is
like Noah's arc, bro. You know, you're
going to be one of the surplus men, but
there's a few places for you on Noah's
arc. So, you just got to sign up and,
you know, put your credit card details
in and and you can live a lifestyle like
mine. And then you look at his lifestyle
on social media and if you didn't know
any better, you you think that this is
insane like Dan Berian type type stuff.
Um, and if you know, even if you're not
a 13-year-old boy, that stuff would can
be quite compelling like like what the
hell is this? Who the hell is this guy?
Like you kind of you're intrigued if
nothing else. If you're kind of a
teenage boy and it's being like
circumventing any other socialization
from your family or your school teachers
or whatever and just straight to your
phone, it's like I want to be like this
guy. I don't want to like you do to be
like my dad who hates his job or
something. It's it's quite a like
seductive thing like they're they're
kind of seducing you in a way like
manipulating you and
>> pushing you down that sales funnel um
and in the process making you feel bad
like like advertising does even outside
of the manosphere sometimes or has done
>> that
suggests that it would be quite upward
aiming that there would be some sort of
improvement that would come out the
other side that there would be results
that would happen and that these men who
go into it that yeah maybe you know the
manosphere is using uh some manipulative
tactics. It's creating a void that they
are able to fill with courses and and
and retreats and boot camps and stuff
like that. But the suggestion here would
be that out the other side of it, you
have an improved human, a better a
better human who who is more of
themselves. But it seems like you're
suggesting that it kind of becomes a a
trap, a sort of liinal space that people
end up in. So I'm trying to square this
circle of how it can be that the answer
is being suggested by this thing but
that then it it it pushes people further
into sort of more victimhood ideologies.
>> Yeah. I mean it becomes a bit like um
like self-help. So uh you must I'm
guessing you've heard that phrase like
shelf help where
>> No. What's that? like where people get
like people get stuck in a cycle of like
self-help programs because there's kind
of they get addicted to the good
emotions and the promise of change but
then the not without actually changing.
So you can kind of and I can see how
that can like you read like you go to a
Tony Robbins seminar or something and
and no shade on like people who do that
or anything but as an example you walk
across the hot coals or something and
then you get this thrill from being
around all these people you know we're
going to change our lives and then for
whatever reason because like life is
complicated it doesn't happen but you
can kind of get addicted to kind of the
good feelings you have at these these
seminars and I've I've I've kind of seen
some of the stuff I attended during the
research for the book how kind of
addicted addictive that could be these
kind of presenting you if you just
follow this road map like anything is
possible and it is it is it is really
kind of um I know you can leave those
places like really excited and then the
the good emotions kind of diminish over
time and then the only way to get them
back is to go to another kind of seminar
um but also the these gurus as well the
the blame is always put on the student
for so you go to these courses uh if you
like there's kind of a a no an implicit
no refunds policy so you go to these
courses and if you don't achieve the if
you don't you know achieve your dream
life or whatever it's the blame is
always put on you in that kind of so
there's that up by the bootstraps thing
like but it's your fault if you if you
don't achieve it you know they've laid
out the road map um or maybe you just
need the the ext this extra course that
you know maybe you need the gold the
gold product or the platinum the
platinum course and then if you buy that
that's that's probably what you need bro
um there's there's this kind of they
keep you in that perpetual thing giving
you these things that don't really work
and then you come back it's like well
this didn't work and it's like well you
didn't you didn't apply it properly or
you know this course wasn't quite right
for you maybe you need this different
guru like there's a lot of people
trapped in that cycle I met who just go
for bounce from one guru to the next and
it's all variations variations of this
kind of same thing
>> there's an idea called spiritual bypass
from the psychedelic community and it
describes a person who goes to
the Amazon rainforest and drinks Iawaska
and has this peak spiritual experience
but doesn't actually integrate any of
the lessons and comes back just the same
[ __ ] that they were when they left
and then goes and does the same thing
again. You kind of see it like spiritual
tourism as well that this person goes on
holiday to have this peak experience and
then comes back and is kind of addicted
to that without the integration of the
change. And I get the sense that it's
it's not too too dissimilar. I mean, at
least with drinking Iawaska, you can
reli
be reliably informed that something's
going to happen. I suppose the uh level
of authenticity and legitimacy of some
of the advice that's coming out of
different areas of the internet for both
men and women is uh maybe not quite as
powerful as Iaska would be. I I'm going
to guess that you saw the article in the
Guardian. Society may have overestimated
the risk of the manosphere. UK
researchers say this offcom thing. So
for the people that didn't see it, it
said many who engage are discriminating
and valued driven with a minority
consuming extremely misogynistic
content. A study for offcom suggests
they found that while a minority
encountered extremely misogynistic
content, many users of the manosphere
were critically engaged, selective, and
capable of discarding messages that did
not resonate with their values. I think
this is still in the aftershock of
adolescence and sort of the the
conversation that was kicked off as a a
broader part of that. But it is nice to
see the Overton window kind of the
bottom end of the Overton window in the
UK you can see with the Guardian and in
the US you might be able to see with the
New York Times. So the New York Times
recently did a piece that was like a
maybe a ADHD is being overdiagnosed in
young boys. Oh my god. If the New York
Times is saying it and it's kind of the
same with the Guardian. Oh hell. Like
this has really hit the mainstream now.
This is a real big deal. They they've
really pushed it too far making these
claims about the the dangers of the the
manosphere. But what what is the end
goal risk that you're concerned about
when it comes to a pipeline of content
in this sort of a way?
>> Yeah. So I mean the the the study Yeah.
you mentioned I saw I did see the study
and I think the issue with that would go
back to also our definition what we
talked about the definition of the
manosphere. So they also included Joe
Rogan as people who watch Joe Rogan as
part of the manosphere. So like to me
hearing that it's like well it's not
surprising that to me that people who
watch Joe Rogan have a whole bunch of
different views you know and and and are
a you know everyone who watches Joe
Rogan isn't going to be an Andrew tape
isn't going to see an Andrew Tape video
and say oh this guy's you know this
guy's like right on the money. So I mean
I think their definition was too broad
to start with. I think with uh so so the
ADHD what you mentioned ADHD I think
there is a parallel in some ways between
that's that in just kind of a
conversational way between like ADHD is
massively overdiagnosed among say
private school kids for example because
it's very costly to get a private ADHD
diagnosis but it's it's under
underdiagnosed among prisoners. So you
have a lot of people in prison who
display uh ADHD adjacent behaviors or or
if they had actually a test they'd
probably test for ADHD and but then you
have a bunch of other people who are
overdiagnosed because it's basically
become a bit of a cheat code in in some
not just private schools but but in
private schools it's kind of a cheat
code. you get kind of extra exam time
similar in a way to um being dyslexic
could be back when uh back when I was
younger. Um there's there's that kind of
there there's there's kind of two sets
of people who who who have effects. So
it's like is it overdiagnosed? Well, yes
and no. And with the manosphere like
adolescence was kind of a moral panic in
some ways. Like you could say, are most
people who consume manosphere content
going to go and murder their classmate?
It's like absolutely not. Absolut
absolutely not. There's there's examples
of people who've done that stuff like
Elliot Roger. Um Lyndon Mloud was kind
of a I would classify that as a red pill
murder that took place in 2021 in
Denver, uh Colorado. But for the most
part, that's not what's happening when
people are consuming this content. But I
would say there's a lot of stuff that
that's going on in relationships I think
which can be negatively influenced by
people watching this content. So you you
do see some attitudes from the
mainstream like the 8020 rule um
permeating the mainstream. So I I saw
saw a poll recently of a Gen Z uh men
and a majority think that uh women are
just attracted to like a small subset of
men. Um that's that's something the
majority think of that that age group
thinks now which to me that's like the a
transposition of the 8020 rule on to
kind of dating. You see kind of um
Andrew Tate has like most most 13 to 15
year olds know who Andrew Tate is and
like a call to have a positive view of
him which is you know a lot of those
people are going to be getting into
relationships are going to be conversing
with the girls at their school. My
auntie's a school teacher and says, you
know, anecdotally that there are boys
who've come into school and have been
kind of mouthing this stuff, telling
women, telling girls to like make a
sandwich, telling female teachers to
like get to the kitchen and stuff and
it's like like verbatim hat. Um, so I
think it's more a low-level thing, like
a low-level nuisance, but also if people
already have that kind of predisposition
for being uh for domestic violence, it's
kind of giving that kind of veneer of
justification to that stuff. I think
there's there's there's a more prosaic
concern
>> that that this stuff happens behind
closed doors, you know, that that that
is kind of rationalizing some of that
stuff.
>> I'd be very interested to know
what the real world results of this end
up being. Uh I don't know if we're
seeing increases in domestic violence
due to manosphere content. I certainly
don't think given the amount of lonely,
sexless,
unengaged
men that we have seen a concordant
amount of violence. Uh I I you know
antisocial behavior orders and uh sort
of um
>> you say also guys ruining their own
blowing up their own relationships by
embracing this stuff. So if you there's
I mean I when I when I was researching
this stuff I used to go on the X red
pill forum and you you you'd have guys
on there posting about you know I I
embrace this stuff and you know my oh my
brothers you know my brother's embraces
stuff now how do I kind of derdicalize
him but but you also started to get
women coming on the site like my
boyfriend's started to you know refuses
to show any emotion refuses to do his
bit of the housework and stuff because
he's been listening to these people or
like I've lost the love of my life
because this guy's been listening to
alpha male dating systems or some or
some like one of these programs. So, I
think it's also guys ruining their own
romantic prospects sometimes by
following this stuff and yeah, we don't
hear really hear about that stuff, but
it's generally not contributing to the
to the sum of human happiness. That's a
good that's a good point that yeah, the
super kinetic newsworthy headlines might
not be what happens, but you might have
a particular type of virus that just
low-level damages the the sort of
foundations. What do you think happens
to male identity when some of the
traditional roles like protector,
provider, and I guess as well procreator
uh start to dissolve a little bit?
What's what sort of a role is that
playing here?
>> Yeah, I think that's that's that's part
of it. So I mean that there has to be
there's a recalibration going on. Um
Richard Reeves obviously talks about
this and talks about how fatherhood can
be a kind of a new like proactive
identity. I think you know for those who
do have children or plan to I think
that's really good. I think that's a
really good thing to anchor your
identity around. But obviously that's
not going to be uh everything because
many people don't have children or you
know life can't be just I think for men
and women always it can't just be like
not everyone wants to just anchor their
whole life around their children. I mean
there's a recalibration going on and and
there there's definitely there were
definitely men in the manosphere who
don't feel that they have status in
society because those old roles that
their fathers grandfathers especially
had um and no longer there and
especially among workingclass people. So
in my last book was going to like former
industrial areas of England where you
have a very strong like if you like
miners were like the aristocracy of the
working class. That was kind of how they
saw themselves. that was how they
carried themselves and there was a sense
that you know even if they didn't have
uh you know loads and loads of money
there was that dignity there was that
you're doing something that not that
many people can do because it's really
hard that physical that physicality of
the labor you're doing the economy is
much more like you know service economy
it's much more kind of
fe feminine if you like whereas it much
more about kind of human relationships
it's not that that brute force anymore
and and I think I do think yeah that it
is difficult I mean we have to I don't
think we should re-industrialize And I
think that's kind of like that that just
doesn't really make sense cuz what are
we going to compete with like Chinese
steel or something or it's like you have
to you have to kind of keep moving
forward I think. But at the same time
the a lot of these manifest influences
telling men that you know you shouldn't
go to college that education makes you a
beta male. that's harmful as well
because I think that you're you're kind
of we are in this more professional
world where you do need to have um like
more credentialized world where you do
even like even a pointless university
degree in some ways you need to get your
foot in the door of some jobs and it's
actually harmful telling men that you
know well the education systems
feminized so you shouldn't do this so I
think they're contributing to it to a
start for a start but also like it's
it's hard because the the provider role
I mean I want to live in a society where
women feel like they can uh do what do
like have the same freedoms I have, they
can pursue a career. Um if they if a
woman earns more than me, um which
actually my girlfriend does earn more
than me, funny enough, but I don't feel
like emasculated by it. Um and that's
fine. And it's like I don't feel like
she's going to leave me if my like
because I'm freelance, my my income can
be like kind of up and down. If I have a
a fow year, I don't feel like she's
going to just immediately leave me. And
she hasn't. So um there that proves my
point but it's like
>> end of one over here
>> but it but it can be that can be
something when you've grown up in a
world where men do have these very kind
of fixed roles and then then someone
comes along for the manosphere and says
yeah you know your your granddad is
right you need to be the provider or
whatever but that world doesn't exist
anymore it creates a sense of cognitive
dissonance which I think then breathes
the resentment the insecurity the anger
that oh well you know maybe she will
leave me if I don't kind
have a six six figure income or
something by the time I'm 25.
>> Yeah, I think it is represented by the
fact that on average most women want to
date a man that earns more than them.
The hypergamy is still there. There's a
really interesting study that I looked
at from IFS that just came out. Uh so
the if you're in the bottom 40%
of earners for men, then your wife
likely earns or your partner likely
earns more than you. And if you're in
the top 20% of earners for women, then
it's likely that you earn more than your
male partner as well. So we have got at
the bottom end of the distribution for
men, at the top end of the distribution
for women, we have got either primary
bread winner in the first instance or at
least uh over earner in the second
instance. Um but for the vast majority
of the middle of it, it's working in
another direction. And I I do think, you
know, this is something the ugly truth
behind a lot of this stuff is that we
can we have a world which is changing
more quickly than our preferences can
adapt to it. And that there are a lot of
kernels of truth in much of the
evolutionary psychology underpinnings
that then kind of get run with and and
and turned into extreme that do take a
lot of liberties, I think, with what the
science and what the evidence would
suggest. But then on the flip side to
completely deny the fact that like how
many women say that you know these guys
they're just they're just not very
mature you know they haven't got their
life together. What is it they mean by
that? They mean that he probably doesn't
have any goals. He probably doesn't have
direction. He's not that fired up about
his job. He doesn't he's not going to
make me feel safe in the fact that in
future if we have children I feel like
he's going to be able to look after us.
Yes, living costs have gone up, which
means that a single family, a single
parent income for two people to raise a
third, right, is is difficult. So, you
go
I
>> Yeah,
>> the kernels of truth, I think, is kind
of what burst out into this.
>> Yeah. I mean, I think it's it's it's
difficult with some of that stuff
because I wouldn't discount anything
anything you said there. Um, but I also
think it's it's it's hard to know with
this stuff. So I I don't dismiss like
evolutionary psychology. I think the
idea that evolution kind of stocked from
the neck up is just kind of a bit Yeah,
that doesn't really that doesn't really
make sense to me. But at the same time,
I think it's hard to it's hard to
disentangle some of the nature and
nurture stuff. So I mean yeah it doesn't
surprise me that that say young women
would want a men a man who earns the
same or more than them when if they if
they have a kid it's uh women's like
earnings just kind of shoot down in this
country in Britain we have like two
weeks paternity leave if if you're a
guy. So kind of the woman's expected to
take the time off work and kind of
jettison her career very often. So I
mean yeah I I wouldn't say that that
therefore you know that means it's
definitely all like nurture. I I think
it's just difficult really difficult to
disentangle those things and we also do
have some way to go in terms of in terms
of sorting out some of the cultural
stuff around like things like paternity
leave and valuing the role of fathers in
a nurturing role as well. And I think
again Richard Reeves is very good on
this. Um, so yeah, it doesn't doesn't
surprise me even if you just even if you
take out the biological biological
stuff, which I'm I'm sure some of that
is is right, is is actually still having
that influence. Um, if you even if you
take out that, I think there'd still be
the same the same kind of impetus to
find a high earning partner because of
simply what happens to women when they
have a kid and straight up
>> the career the career drop off. Yeah.
>> You've got this quote, progressive
institutions are telling men to embrace
tolerance and equality. Meanwhile, in
their day-to-day lives, they had to
compete in an economic system that
rewarded ruthless accumulation and
coming out on top.
>> Yeah. I mean, sorry, you have
>> Go on. Go on. I It's just that that is a
a good identification of the
crossroads I think that we're at.
>> Yeah. Yeah, I mean sometimes I think
some of the kind of progressive rhetoric
around especially in the the the late
2000s the kind of hyper identity
politics era where it's like Loheed
Martin has the like pride flag or I know
we need more disabled drone pilots or
this kind of that that you just fix
societ the kind of Hillary Hillary
Clinton uh elite feminism whatever where
you just fix society by kind of having
like a one-legged lesbian in the
boardroom um and you know therefore like
socialism or or just kind of obviously
I'm exaggerating for effect but it's
like there was that kind of identity
politics where you have these kind of
loveies like celebrity figures you have
these big companies who constantly
preaching equality and Amazon you know
Amazon does this Amazon was doing this
anyway not not anymore but it was doing
this um in in the 2000s and it's like I
I went undercover at an Amazon warehouse
and it's like workers pissing in Coke
bottles because they can't get a toilet
So there's that there's that kind of
hypocrisy there that like preaching to
men also I think this manifests in a way
like preaching to men to take up less
space that the future is female um that
you're the problem that basically you
but you being born was like you winning
the lottery basically like just by by by
dent of being like a white male and then
you grow up as like in certain places in
the UK or America or Europe or or
wherever and life is a sharp elbow word
struggle where you have to kind of be a
bit of a dick, a bit of an [ __ ] a
bit dominant, a bit like sometimes you
have to be like assert yourself.
Sometimes you have to be a bit bit like
at least fake it till you make it. Be a
bit like dominant. You have to kind of
not be the guy who's like pushed down.
Um who doesn't speak up, who's who's
meek or whatever. And I think
particularly in the US um so from from
the time I spent there and and you know
or just like poorer countries in the UK
US is obviously richer but it has a
different economic model but if my
girlfriend's from Brazil and if like you
go to Brazil and it's like there's a
much more masculine like the culture
there is much there's much more like
machismo and part of that you can say is
like yeah that's partly because um
there's there's just kind of it's less
progressive in terms of sort of gender
roles. Yes that's true but it's also
just because it's like a survival thing.
you're just in this environment where
you have to be a bit more masculine. You
have to be a bit more like project
strength a bit more because otherwise
you're just going to get like crushed
under underfoot basically. And I just
think there's that hypocrisy there where
you have an economic system which does
reward that kind of striving that kind
of assertiveness like you go into a
boardroom or something and you have to
kind of command attention while at the
same time telling like young men in
particular that well no you just need to
be quiet, you just need to take up less
space. And yeah, some people that's true
for them. Some people they do need to do
that. But then for people like me when I
was younger or like for other guys
that's like not what they need to hear.
they will take that to heart and then it
leaves them in an even worse place than
they were before.
>> Why is there no leftwing manosphere?
>> Um I mean yeah I mean that's that's a
good question. I mean why is then I
think why is there no leftwing
manosphere if the manosphere is an
anti-feminist movement? I think that
makes sense. But why is I think a a a
good question is like why is there
why is like going to the gym and lifting
weights for example often treated with
suspicion in like the pages of comment
is free in the Guardian or something. I
I don't know. I think it's um partly
snobbery because it tends to be
something that uh workingass guys do
more than than middle- class guys. It's
just like a cultural gap. So there's
that lack of relatability which also is
why I think you see more lower middle
class working-class men getting into
something like Joe Rogan because like
that kind of the also didactic aspect of
it where you didn't have formal learning
but oh let's go to talk to this like
>> astrophysicist or something that's cool
like I mean I listen to that and also
but also the relatability like oh this
guy also goes to the gym this guy also
you know isn't isn't averse to smoking a
bit of weed or something someone who
kind of is a bit of you know, has
tattoos or whatever. There's there's
just that kind of that superficial
aspect which also works against guys as
well sometimes from uh these kind of
upper middle class people in in the
media, which it mostly is, uh who kind
of just look down on people like that. I
suppose that might explain as well why
more workingclass men seem to be leaning
right and not leaning left despite the
fact that ostensibly the party of the
left is supposed to be the party of the
working class and about lifting up class
issues not race issues or gender issues.
>> Yeah. So I mean there's there's there's
a whole bunch of stuff like to unpack
with that in that it's it's less
electorally important for the left. the
left doesn't really have that
constituency anymore of like unionized
men that it had in the past in the UK,
in the US like that blue collar, the red
wolf boat is called in the UK. It does
it's kind of fractured. It's kind of
fracturing. It's not really that core
constituency anymore. So, it doesn't
feel the need to it it prefers to talk
to like people in cities, you know,
graduates, liberal graduates in cities.
Um, that's part of it. And I also think
yeah, the the the professionalization of
politics as well. So you have um a
greater distance between politicians and
uh just the kind of people they
represent which is most like tends to be
you know lots of of of working-class
people you know that's the biggest most
people don't you know have own capital
most people are kind of workingass and
also I think the death of local
journalism is a big factor in that stuff
as well so that just the distance
between the professional class of
politicians Oxbridge uh private school
often and just kind of working-class
people especially among
uh left leading parties. Um they just
kind of it just that you can't really
relate to the people you're I think you
can't really relate to the people you're
voting for which I do think is on some
level quite important and and and Trump
talks about even though I think he does
less for men working-class men than the
Democrats. He talks about them. He
acknowledges them. Whereas Camala Harris
in the US election, they they had an
okay platform uh from what I remember
for for working-class people and men
included, but they just they're kind of
very averse to talking acknowledging
that men have problems as well. Um so I
think that's kind of sunk sunk some of
these progressive movements.
>> Yeah. Do you think progressivism is kind
of uncomfortable at acknowledging male
suffering unless it's villainized in
that way?
>> Yeah, for sure. I mean it's it's um
Yeah. Yeah. I mean like intersection
intersectionality like this this like
theory. I think the problem with with a
lot of that that kind of distinct
hierarchy of of oppression. Uh so so
black men are more likely to end up in
prison or more likely to um be stopped
by the police or more likely to to be
failed by the school by the education
system in in the United States than than
black women. But because that kind of
hierarchy, they're seen as like as as
kind of they have more power than than
than black women. Even though it's it's
complex, you know, I think these these
rigid taxonomies of oppressor oppressed
uh lead to these these situations where
yeah, men's issues uh are often
neglected. the fact that men can be
victims of domestic violence. the fact
that the men can. So, I had a stalker a
few years ago and it was uh yeah, it was
it was it was actually when you when you
talk about that, I don't think it
elicits the same reaction as it does
when a woman talks about having a
stalker and yeah, maybe because the the
threat of violence and is is not there,
but it's still I think emotionally that
can be so personally it was a terrible
experience and um
>> yeah, I have friends who had the same
thing and it doesn't it's kind of seen
as a joke if you're a guy and you and
you kind of go through that stuff. Um,
so yeah, there is a bit of a double
standard. I think
>> I wonder what a truly inclusive
or male inclusive progressive politics
would look like. Like I actually I
actually can't envision that U-turn at
the moment. I I I think that the the
intersecting hierarchy and the grievance
culture uh doesn't really leave much
room for that. So, I get the sense that
it's a little bit of a um a Gordian knot
until something changes quite
fundamentally.
>> I mean, I think I think the problem is
is the way we see our opponents
politically is often shaped by a lot by
social media to to make a kind of trit
point. But I think so if I go to so I'm
kind of center left. If I go to a I
don't know conservative club or
conservative meetup or whatever, have a
glass of wine of course and I I'll
probably meet people there who I have a
nice interaction with, have a nice
conversation with and could be friends
with, but then my impression sometimes
if I spend a bunch of time online, it's
like the the the the my the
conservatives who get promoted up the or
the right-wingers sometimes who get
promoted up the feed, it's like or who
who just have that kind of uh who who
figured out the algorithm whatever it
tends to be the most shrill voices, the
most narcissistic voices, but also the
same is true on the left as well. So, I
mean, particularly a few years ago, you
have like feminists on Twitter, the ones
who are kind of rising to the top is
like kill all men uh and all this kind
of horrible like rhetoric, but then if
you actually go to some kind of, you
know, garden variety feminist and
they're not going to treat you like they
think that they're not going to treat
you as kind of that your concerns don't
matter. I haven't found that when I
actually get out in the world away from
the online stuff that I I people are
more complex and I think sometimes we we
we kind of we did think that online
everyone's kind of siloed into their own
kind of information ecosystems where
you're not seeing the opponents. I think
it's actually that you see the worst of
I mean this isn't really original point
but you see the worst of your opponents
and that becomes like the left is like
they're all these like communists and
you know they want to turn the Britain
into Venezuela or American to Venezuela
where it's like most kind of milktoast
people who have a kind of mixed like
complex nuance views about stuff. So I
think social media is is big part of the
way we see our opponents in this like
really black and white negative light.
The online world is not the real world.
Shock, horror.
>> Well, increasingly it is, which I think
is probably the uh problem.
>> This is a great uh a great point that
Freyer India made to me last year, which
was people make that point and they say
the online world is not the real world.
Why are people getting so caught up in
whatever it is that they're seeing on
the internet? But if you are a young guy
or girl who spends 6 hours or 8 hours a
day of screen time, you're spending more
time on your screen than you are asleep.
The online world is the real world to
you. It's how you mediate most of your
experiences. You're definitely speaking
to more people and seeing more people on
the internet than you are in real life
unless you're an outbound teles
salesperson.
Uh so yeah, I it's an interesting
challenge um because you're not going to
get in and sanitize the internet. You're
not going to be able to sort of
counteract this. Um, I I I'm interested
in how you think about sort of blending
a desire to inspire men and and give
them something aspirational to look up
to, to actually speak to what it is that
they want while
trying to not have predatory tactics or
this sort of sense of lack that it that
can uh create a vacuum that they get
sucked into, go into or go in the other
direction and not understand what it is
that men want. There was this
uh breakdown of something else to do
with the manosphere and an accusation
thrown at Jordan Peterson that he was
promoting ideas of mastery,
self-discipline, and hard work often
linked with problematic views. It's
like, come on. Holy [ __ ] Like not only
is it totally tonedeaf to not understand
why that would be attractive to guys,
but also look at any woman and say,
"Hey, do you think that discipline and
selfmastery and hard work would be the
kind of trait that you would look for in
a future partner?" And I bet that the
author, female author of that article as
well is also like the rules for the but
not for me thing. I just squaring this
circle, finding a
culturally acceptable in the modern
world with all of the [ __ ] that's that's
happened and all the rest of it, but
attractive to men
place for the narrative and the
communication to go. Uh, is that an
intractable problem? Is that just Are we
in two different worlds at the moment
with what culture finds acceptable and
what men find attractive?
>> Yeah, I mean, I don't think it's
intractable. I think that the a big
problem that I encountered with the man
through like my journey through the
manosphere so to speak is it's attaching
stat is viewing women as status objects
and
deriving your status from power over
women. So women as kind of a a form of
property or that the kind of so an
interesting example I use in the book is
uh you you see in the red pill spaces
you see some admiration for like
Vladimir Putin which you know there's
there's a whole bunch of stuff to unpack
there but Putin's like they see Putin as
like the alpha male and and one thing
Putin did was he decriminalized domestic
violence in Russia partially
decriminalized domestic violence and
it's like why would he do that and it's
partly because he has nothing to offer
Russia men apart from like poverty, war
but you know you may feel like this
outside of the home but at least in your
home you can be you can feel like a
feudal lord so you can dominate your
family. So there is that kind of sense
that uh the part of the masculine role
is you may not have a great deal of
stake in society. Uh but in that kind of
hierarchy in the home you're basically
like an oligarch. you have that kind of
and and something was similar was done
in the in the in the South in the
American South um before the Civil War
where they got working the the
Confederate got working-class people,
white working-class men on side by
saying that, you know, you may you may
have little stake in society, but at
least you're above the kind of black
population. At least you can kind of uh
you're you're an oligarch in terms of
you can own you can own a slave. There
is that kind of I think masculinity. So
on the one hand it's masculinity to me
is like being comfortable in your own
skin which can take a long time growing
up. Um you try on various like faciles
like very do like various facads where
you know be the alpha male or be the
like goth or like be the punk or
whatever. But like getting older it
becomes easier. You kind of realize that
no one cared like all along uh what you
were doing and you kind of just become
comfortable like you stop giving so much
of a [ __ ] Um, that's that's part of it,
but it's also I think when we talk about
being the provider and protector, I
think, yeah, there's there's aspects of
that that can be can be really positive,
but it's also as men, I think, stop we
need to kind of stop deriving our status
from like the woman on our arm or the
woman who we have kind of at home as
like in the past it would be kind of a
helper and like servant. I'm not saying
it's like that in most most
relationships nowadays, but I think
sometimes that kind of feeling of a
woman as kind of a trophy object for
like a correct performance of
masculinity. And funnily enough, when I
think when people stop doing that, they
also do better in with the opposite sex
as well. It's kind of one of those weird
paradoxes that you sort of only learn
when it's too late, as you kind of like
I'm 42 now. You kind of learn it as you
get older. And I've seen lots of guys go
through this thing where you stop caring
and then you kind of um become more
comfortable in your own skin and you
don't kind of need those kind of
external things so much. Again, it's a
work in progress. I'm not saying that
I'm kind of enlightened or like the
Buddha or something, but you you become
kind of um where you're not deriving
status so much from those external
things, including um what other guys
think of like your partner or something
or whatever or just like that kind of
thing you think you should have. And and
yeah, I think there's something to that.
Um uh yeah I think like I remember you
listening to Echart toll the pickup guys
re recommending like Eart and it's like
yeah there's actually something to that
kind of uh not putting so much into like
attachments and I think part of that is
also like not seeing women as status
objects seeing them as like fellow human
beings. They're not like from you know
it's not like Mars Venus it's like we're
more similar than we are different even
though it's fine to talk about the
differences. Um, I think that's that's
uh part of it and I think I think we're
still working through that. It's like
we're talking now and it's like we're
still kind of the whole thing is like
we're still kind of working through that
whole thing. It's like relatively recent
that you know people like my mom my mom
weren't allowed to kind of weren't
treated the same way in in the workplace
as like you know men and it's still kind
of we're still working through it. So
yeah, I I I do think I don't think it's
I think it's too soon to say that there
are kind of irreconcilable differences
there. We're just kind of all of these
conversations are part of the working
through of that.
>> Yeah. I uh it's an interesting challenge
to think
what what can we do to
play the game that men are naturally
predisposed to. I get what you mean
about not seeing women as status
objects. It's probably not good to like
wear them like you would a new Rolex.
Um, but on the flip side, it is
unrealistic to tell men that they
shouldn't derive a sense of satisfaction
from being selected by a woman. You
know, it's one of the reasons that I'm
quite bearish on VR girlfriends in the
same way as no guy really flexes how
many Only Fans girls he subscribes to.
Um,
>> how much porn he's watched.
>> Exactly. There's the the reason the
reason that uh there is
positive reinforcement, the reason that
a man feels good when he is with a
woman, presumably one that he likes, is
that there is a sense that there were
many potential suitors for her and he
was chosen. But if all you need is the
price of a cheeseburger per month to pay
for this Only Fan model subscription or
to get this VR girlfriend, then that's
not quite the same. Now, I might eat my
own words in three years time when
everyone's [ __ ] addicted to VR only
fans or something, uh, with a Apple
Vision Pro number three on their heads.
I just get the sense that so much of
what men want is to feel competent and
part of feeling competent also involves
feeling competent with women and that
involves being chosen. So, even with
that, I I totally understand what you
mean. And, you know, the best uh
interpretation of it is, hey, treat them
like people. That's a that's a probably
a good place to start. But on the flip
side of that, I I would struggle to
I I think most girls would say, "Yeah, I
want my partner to feel proud that
they're with me. I actually there's a
bit of me that kind of finds it a turnon
for them to see me like a little bit of
a trophy. Like [ __ ] like I got this
girl. I'm special. I'm lucky to be with
her." And again, the devil is in the
details. And as we become ever more like
internet autistic because we're spending
so little time communicating face to
face um the the nuance of this which is
both things are true at the same time.
Probably a good idea to treat women as
actual humans. Also both you and her
will like the fact that you treat her
like a like a a a delicate [ __ ] prize
like something that was that was worthy
of working hard for. Because if you
don't, if you say, "Okay, like, you
know, don't treat them like a trophy."
It's a very slippery slope to be like,
"Well, you're not going to treat them
well." It's like, "Why should you pay
for the first date? Why should you hold
the door open for them?" And I'm aware
that that's not what you're saying. But,
you know what I mean? Like, all of this
stuff when you look at it through an
analytical mindset, which is what
everybody's doing because everything is
so sanitized and and and sterilized,
right? You're not you're not spending
time
observing things in context. You're
looking at them in isolation. this 10
second Tik Tok on street interview this
video which is not contextualized you
don't know the person you haven't spent
time building them up so I think that's
a challenge and I I think the other side
is so much of the dating advice for men
even the most modern in fact as much the
modern iteration as the old pickup
artist stuff but in a much more subtle
way that doesn't kind of identify itself
up front almost none of it is actually
advising men how to do things that are
good for long-term relationship
development. So, for instance, kind of
the the term being thrown around of
being a simp within a relationship that
if you were to post a photo on your
Instagram of some flowers that you
bought your girlfriend, your girlfriend
that you've been with for 6 months,
there is a pretty sizable cohort of guys
who are redpilled that would say, "Can't
believe that you're sing for her, bro.
Like, we've already lost him." It's like
we're in a [ __ ] relationship. Like
where does the line get drawn between me
doing something nice for my partner and
in your opinion like buying her
affection by being so pliable as to need
to offer her flowers in exchange for
love and adoration? and you go, "Okay,
so there is this sort of weird push and
pull dynamic where you're purposefully
withholding
a level of love and connection and care
and attention and affection for your
partner
because that's like being too pliable."
And maybe if it was the first date and
you turned up with a [ __ ] huge
bouquet of flowers, yes, that probably
would be a little bit too much. That
would be coming on too strong. telling
her, "Make sure that you text me when
you get in to let me know that you've
got home safe or what, you know, all of
the things." But six months in or one
year in, like, it's a very different
world. And actually, the things that you
do then are about deepening connection.
And unfortunately, so much of the advice
gets centered around real short-term
uh mating strategies, which is fine if
that's what you want, but as you've seen
with sort of whatever is red pill rehab
or ex xpua pua hate or whatever, uh
these guys get they feel resentful uh
for that because they think [ __ ] like I
actually especially as they grow up and
they age out and it doesn't take that
long for guys to age out. as they do age
out, they get to the stage where they
go, I really I really like the idea of
someone to watch that new Netflix
documentary about the Vietnam War with
uh most evenings. And the only tactic
that I have is withholding love, which
necessarily caps the amount of
investment I can get from a a good woman
in any case.
>> Yeah. It's like ne I'm going to just go
and neg my girlfriend of a year or
whatever.
just like stuck in that loop. Just she
says something nice, you just negot. Um
yeah, I mean there's there's a balance.
It's like moderation in all things, I
suppose. So so yeah, there's nothing
wrong with, you know, go out to a nice
restaurant, you have uh your your your
your girlfriend's like made lots of
effort, looks really nice. There's no
there's nothing wrong with obviously
being proud and yeah, it does feel like
you're kind of you feel kind of like the
[ __ ] as well. There's nothing there's
nothing wrong with that. I'd say the
problem is when it becomes like there's
a slippery slope almost in both
directions where the problem becomes
where you make that kind of a philosophy
where you kind of you need the
validation of of of almost other men or
other people to to to kind of validate
your choices like you you you value you
start to value that person. So I met I
met guys who got into the manosphere who
were in the pickup surf in the status
maxing scene who would like they always
didn't know what they wanted. So you'd
ask them like, "What is your type?" And
it's like they're going after women who
it's to impress their friends or to
impress or for social media or to
impress these other guys. It's like
they're not happy. It's like but like
you got to figure out you got to drill
down on what what makes you happy and
what your type is, someone you have who
you have a someone you're physically
attracted to, but also someone who you
have a kind of great vibe with. And I
think that kind of once you start kind
of doing it as some performative thing.
So making that a philosophy of your
life, then it becomes difficult. It
doesn't mean don't enjoy those. Doesn't
mean don't enjoy having nice things and
having people kind of giving that glance
of like slightly envious. It's like,
yeah, that's kind of a buzz and stuff,
but it's not making it kind of the
centerpiece of your life. Like there's
more to life than girls. There's more to
life than, you know, having a nice car,
whatever it is. Um, you know, not to
compare those two things, but there's
more there's more to life than having
kind of people admiring you, you know.
Um, but also like the the the the other
aspect of the thing those some of those
like red pill guys do get right and I
will say that is in a relationship you
shouldn't just like stagnate. You
shouldn't just be like well you know I'
I've I've met met met friends of mine I'
I've had friends of mine who said like
um you've got married and it's like I'm
just going to let kind of let myself go
now. um you know people put on loads of
weight like stop going to the gym and
it's kind of disrespectful to the
partner like you do have to like it's
not necessarily it shouldn't be
unconditional that kind of relationship
uh I I think to some degree like yeah
like if one person gets afflicted with
some illness or something then I think I
think you know you should stand by them
there's a deeper love that you draw on
there's a deeper love that you know a
connection that you draw on but you
should just out of respect for yourself
and respect for the other and try and
keep your [ __ ] together, you know, in a
relationship. Go to the gym, keep your,
you know, work stuff on point. Make sure
you're you're not, you know, getting
fired or like slacking at work, you
know.
>> Sounding increasingly rightwing here,
James.
>> Yeah. But but it's it's kind of respect
for the other person, you know, like um
because otherwise if you don't do that
stuff, you're going to you're expecting
them to kind of bail you out and and I I
do think there's an element of that like
like you don't just like have a you
don't just get married or something and
then that you just like stop. That's it.
That's like everything. I've I've I've
caught her. I've like caught her now, so
I don't need to like do anything. I
think, you know, you should keep keep on
top of your stuff as well. Um cuz yeah,
otherwise you're more like, I think, to
have problems down the line. They're
more likely for those kind of
resentments to creep into the
relationship even if they, you know, are
not spoken out loud. I I do think that
stuff's important.
James Bworth, ladies and gentlemen,
James, it's uh timely for you to be uh
digging into this stuff and I think
whatever the next few years, it it feels
like this circle is going to have to
square at least a little bit. Uh in
politics, it's going to have to happen
because if young men keep getting
ignored by the left, that's not going to
be good for them. So, there's going to
have to be some sort of a pivot there. I
think that the crisis of men and boys in
schools, mental health, self harm,
suicide, stuff like that is just uh the
retreat from education and employment,
the der of eligible partners that is
going to affect both men and women. Men
are going to be lonely, women are going
to be lonely, birth rate decline, like
you know, there is it's a real uh
concatenation of of problems. So, very
timely for you to do your your deep dive
into it. Where should people go? They're
going to want to check out all of the
stuff that you've got going on.
>> Yeah. Thank Thank you, Chris. It's it's
nice to be back as well. Um I mean yeah,
Lost Boys, a personal journey through
the manosphere is my book. It's uh it's
out in all good bookstores. Uh also non-
good books, less good bookstores, but it
doesn't make any difference to me. Like
I still get paid. Um so yeah, you can
you can find it in Water St. Amazon, uh
wherever
>> and you're shouting at people on Twitter
as well.
>> Yes. So Twitter I'm j_boodworth.
Instagram is James.Bloodworth.
>> Okay, James, I appreciate you, man.
Until your next time.
>> Thank you, Chris. Congratulations. You
made it to the end of the episode. And
if you want more, well, why don't you
press right here?
Come on.
[Music]