Video summary
The video features a discussion between Julia C. Patrick and Deanna Peterson regarding critical financial warning signs that nonprofit boards must monitor to ensure organizational sustainability. The conversation highlights that the nonprofit sector is highly diverse, with different subsectors like universities, theaters, and associations having unique financial needs, meaning that expertise from one area cannot be automatically applied to another. A primary red flag identified is consistent budget deficits; while a single year of deficit might be part of a strategic plan for growth, recurring annual losses indicate an unsustainable financial model that requires immediate attention rather than relying on ad-hoc fundraising fixes.
Another significant concern raised is the timeliness of financial reporting, which serves as a crucial indicator of internal management health. If a board does not receive accurate financial statements two to three weeks before a meeting, it suggests that management may be operating blindly without real-time data to make informed decisions. This delay often forces boards to react to surprises rather than proactively managing cash flow and program viability. Furthermore, the shrinking of unrestricted reserves is a direct consequence of chronic deficits and poor budgeting practices; organizations must intentionally manage these funds as a safety net rather than dipping into them accidentally due to a lack of timely financial oversight or strategic planning.
The dialogue also emphasizes the dangers of over-reliance on a single major funder, whether that be an individual donor, a foundation, or a government grant. Depending heavily on one source creates significant risk, as the loss of that specific funding stream could cripple the entire organization. Boards are encouraged to diversify revenue streams through fee-for-service programs and monthly giving initiatives, similar to how investors diversify their portfolios to mitigate risk. Additionally, analyzing liquidity is essential; organizations must understand their "cash runway"—how many months they can operate without income—and plan for seasonal dips in cash flow to ensure they never face a cliff where payroll cannot be met.
To effectively address these issues, the speakers recommend integrating these five red flags into regular board reporting structures rather than treating them as occasional topics. By establishing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that track surplus budgets, reserve levels, funding diversification percentages, and cash runway every month, boards can maintain a habit of fiscal vigilance. This proactive approach transforms financial management from a reactive scramble into a strategic discipline, allowing the organization to anticipate challenges, educate its leadership team effectively, and ultimately build a resilient foundation for long-term mission achievement.
Read the full video transcript
Hey, welcome back everybody. It's
another important day on the nonprofit
show because we kick off nonprofit power
week with our friends over at your
part-time controller and we're doing
this with the amazing Deanna Peterson.
She's a director at YPTC. Hey, welcome
back my friend.
>> Hi Julia. It's great to be here again. I
always love joining the show.
>> Well, we are excited to have you on. Um
Diana Peterson, we are delighted to have
you on. Um again, nonprofit power week
is super important for us here um on the
nonprofit show. we don't do very often.
Uh just a couple times a year, but it's
a big thing for us and so we're very
excited. Uh along with our presenting
sponsors who support this includes
Bloomerang, American Nonprofit Academy,
Staffing Boutique, JMT Consulting, Third
Sector Company, of course, our friends
at your part-time controller, and then
one of our newest partners, Martis. So,
we are super excited to have everyone
with us uh for this really important
week. I'm Julia C. Patrick, CEO of the
American Nonprofit Academy. Okay. Deanna
Peterson, even though we razed you at
the very beginning of the show. Um,
you're a director at your part-time
controller, which is a really important
job. Talk to us about what it is that
you are doing and how you lead within
um, YPTC.
>> Yeah, so I am in charge of all of our
sub sector specializations. So, all of
the different types of nonprofits that
we serve. I lead our subject matter
experts in ways to connect with the
public and then also ways to resource
our staff so that we can best serve
those types of organizations. We have 19
different subsectors that we specialize
in here at YPTC.
>> So can you kind of give me an idea of
what that means? like what does a sub
sub sector
look like to then the somebody like who
might be like what what does that mean
>> right of course so the nonprofit sector
is just as diverse as a for-profit
sector and a lot of companies want to
serve nonprofits and they kind of put
them all in one bucket however
universities and colleges are going to
be very different from theaters and
museums which are very different from
associations membership organizations so
those kind of the types of subsectors
I'm talking about. Not just are their
programs different, but also their
finances, their accounting rules, and
everything like that, too.
>> Wow. I love that you talked about this
because I think to the uninitiated, we
do lump everybody together. And I see
this a lot where uh even just in the HR
world where people are like, "Oh, you've
been in the nonprofit business? No
problem." home. It's like, yeah, but I
worked at a dog shelter and let it and
we were very successful. Could I run an
opera company? Maybe not. But for some
reason, a lot of times we just throw
everybody together. So, this is really
interesting. Thank you for explaining
that to us. Well, we know, Deanna, that
boards are really one of those groups
that have to make major financial
decisions and yet they're not in the
thick of things every day. and you've
identified some red flags that we should
be thinking about if we're a board
member, if we're working with our board,
um if we're just looking at the health
of our organization. And so, let's kick
off red flag number one. And that means
a big thing that is consistent budget
deficits. And uh that that dword
kind of freaks me out.
What does this mean or what should it
mean?
>> So, it's not really if one year you have
a budget deficit that's a red flag. It's
if year after year after year you have
budget deficits and the organization
just says, "Well, this is just what we
have to spend in order to get the
programs
accomplished like we want to." Well, we
also need to have the funding that it
takes to have these programs be
effective. So really in my opinion
whether a budget should be a surplus
which should be most years by the way or
if one off year you need to have a
deficit that needs to be done in the
strategic planning process. So when
you're looking at your 3 to five year
strategic plan, when you're thinking
about okay, these is what this is what
we want to accomplish, maybe you
identify that year three needs to be a
deficit for that key growth initiative
in order to actually implement it. But
then that also means that obviously year
one and two need to be a surplus. You
have to have more money coming in than
you're spending so that you can
strategically invest in the years that
you need to invest. But a consistent
deficit year-over-year is not
sustainable and it's not helpful for the
organization to just be around as long
as you want it to be. Okay, you're
frying my brain a little bit because I'm
thinking about the hours and the hours
and the days and the days that I've been
involved as a board member with
strategic planning. I've never heard
anyone speak about taking that approach
and putting it into the strategic plan.
Um, it's brilliant and it would have
caused a lot less upset if we had kind
of been thinking about it because for
most organizations it's not a shock.
It's a shock when you don't plan for it,
right? But I mean, it's not like, oh,
the building burnt down and so we're
going to run a deficit. A lot of times
you can see this coming. Is that fair to
say?
>> Exactly. You should be able to see it
coming because you should know where you
are financially. And again, when you're
in that five-year plan, you know, okay,
I am going to we want to build this
building. We want to launch a new
program. This is our five-year plan.
Well, how what is that going to take
financially? So instead of budgeting for
the entire five years, you should at
least be able to know holistically
how much money do we need to raise, how
much do we need to spend and kind of
look at that holistically through those
five years big picture. And then when
you go into that again year three in our
example where maybe we need to have a
deficit budget that one year
>> you it's not a surprise to the board.
Whereas sometimes if an organization
knows this is just what we have to do,
but they haven't really communicated
that well to the board, then the board
struggles with approving a budget.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. And putting so much pressure
on that executive director or
development team to fix it by just
raising more money,
>> right? Wow. This is a what a a really
interesting way to kick off the red
flags. Okay. So, red flag number two,
delayed financial reporting. Yeah.
>> So, this one is huge. If you are not get
as a board, if you are not getting
financials timely and a couple of days
before the board meeting so that you can
process that, then likely management is
also not getting those financials
timely. So, therefore, how are they
managing the organization? How do they
know if they're on track to that budget?
How do they know if a program is
financially stable or viable? What are
they how are they running the
organization or are they just kind of
running it blind because they don't have
this information?
>> So, what's realistic? I mean, I know
that with so many of our guests talking
about AI and how that's integrating
into, you know, just financial
management, how fast should the
organization and the board um expect or
set an expectation to get that
information? Again, love that you
brought up you need this information
before the board meeting so that you can
review it. But but what should we be
really thinking about in terms of that
timing?
>> That's a good question. And sometimes it
actually means maybe moving the meeting,
right? So I would say between two and
three weeks,
>> okay,
>> after the month end. So it's January,
month end is December. You're you should
be able to get December's financials or
at least a draft because if it's your
year end or something, you might just
have to have a draft, but within two to
three weeks so that you can kind of
understand your cash position,
understand where your organization is to
budget, that kind of thing.
>> Okay. Thank you. You know, I didn't know
what you were going to say and that's
good. That's that's really interesting.
I love that. And I'm like super
intrigued by just the concept of saying,
"No, we're not going to have a meeting.
We're and I'm I believe you have to
schedule your meetings out a whole year
in advance." But but looking that
looking towards that, okay, maybe we're
now going to start meeting the third
week of each month because we
>> That's what I recommend.
>> Exactly. Instead of having that board
meeting the first week of the month,
you're always going to be looking at a
whole month behind of financials. So,
plan the calendar around when you can
connect.
>> Okay. So, not only do you look like a
teenager, you're a smart cookie.
>> Well, I've been doing it for a while.
I've been doing this for a little while.
>> Oh gosh, that that sounded so terrible.
But we've known one another for many
years, so I know that I can tease
Deanna. Okay, so the first one and two
red flags been burners and really
interesting, but let's move into red
flag number three. Unrestricted reserves
and noticing that maybe they're
shrinking or changing.
Talk to us about this.
>> Yeah, this goes handinhand to that
consistent budget deficits. Okay.
>> So, if you're consistently seeing that
you're not bringing in more money than
you're spending, you're going to see
shrinking unres unrestricted reserves,
assuming you have them, of course. So,
hopefully you have them to start with,
but if you're seeing them shrink, this
is a huge red flag.
>> Okay. And that would be like year over
year or month over month. like
what is the trajectory of time that that
we should be thinking about this? It
seems to me if you're doing year over
year, that's too late, right?
>> Yeah. I mean, you can track
year-over-year every single month and
see, okay, where are we at with our
reserve this month versus last year at
the same time? So, that's one way you
can track it. Another way would be to
just have your unrestricted reserves in
a different account so that it can be
really intentional. the the right way to
do it is to have unrestricted reserves
in place and then be really intentional
about when you potentially need to dip
into those reserves. It shouldn't just
be by accident. And what we see a lot of
times is that nonprofits who aren't
getting their financials timely or who
are budgeting for a break even or a
deficit are accidentally
dipping into those restrict unrestricted
reserves. And that's just not best
practice. You really want to make sure
you're intentional in the way that
you're spending your money,
>> right? I love that you you kind of
painted that full-on picture. Um, so
it's not just an item in a spreadsheet,
but it's actually a practice. Yeah,
that's smart, Diana. That's really
really smart. Okay, red flag number
four. And this is I was telling you in
the green room I just heard from a major
funer um in my community that they were
concerned about this um excessive
dependence on one funer. Again share
with us what you think this should mean
and why we should be thinking about
this. I think it means risky risky
risky. Any single one funer whether it
is a donor a individual donor or a
foundation or the government department
for your grants. Any one funer can go
away at any time. We cannot rely on a
year over year over year. Oh, they've
always given us that $500,000 grant
every single year. We're going to get it
again.
>> We can't rely on that. And by doing so,
it's just risky because when something
happens and all of a sudden you don't
have that fun,
if it is go if losing one funder is
detrimental to your entire organization,
that's a problem.
>> Yeah, really a good comment. And I would
say too, um, it it kind of skews your
relationship management. You know, when
you have a funer that's like you're
you're it's so critical, it's it's
you can get mission creep. It's harder
to walk away. It's it's uh it changes
that power dynamic, if you will. Um
Yeah,
>> 100%. Yeah, this is important, you know,
and I also think too I see boards
leading this and even people in
development that are like all I need is
one rich person and all my problems will
go away, right? You know, it it's just
an awful mindset, if you will. And I'm
wondering if you've heard that from from
clients.
>> We always try to steer clients back to
that revenue diversification. Most
accountants and finance managers are
going to go back to you have to be
diversified. Where can you find some fee
for service programming? Where can you
be creative at your messaging? Who where
is your impact? Who cares about that
impact? And how can you tell that story
in order to get money from multiple
different sources so that you can
fulfill your mission? That's really what
we like to steer nonprofits towards as
opposed to think about that one, you
know, rich person to to give the money.
>> Yeah. You know, I think this is the the
ultimate case for sustainable giving.
You know, those monthly giving programs
that are so easy now with technology to
manage and to structure. And donors like
this, you know, they like that monthly
giving. it's smaller amount that adds up
over the 12 months and that it really
changes I think the discussion about how
you work with your donors, how you
communicate. I loved what you just said
about sharing that impact um with a
bigger group versus just that one donor
that you're just freaked out that
they're gonna not leave you, right? Um,
you mentioned something in the green
room that I I hadn't really thought
about, but I do know um that a lot of
times funders don't want that long-term
relationship. They want to move on maybe
three to five years after a big
investment. What are you seeing there?
We're seeing a lot of kind of capacity
building funding where a foundation
wants to provide some kind of a capacity
building funding for three to five years
for an organization and then they need
to move on to something else because
they have constituents that they want to
show impact across multiple
organizations across a sector. Right?
So, we have to make sure as the
nonprofit who's receiving these funds
that we're using those funds to build up
our structures, build up our systems,
build up our the way that we're
connecting with the public so that we
can be sustainable going forward as
opposed to just saying, you know, oh,
we're always going to have this $500,000
grant every year or something like that.
It's not
>> you can't rely on something long term
like that.
>> Right. Right. Yeah. It's just such a a
it to me, Deanna, and and before we move
on to red flag number five, it seems to
me like for a lot of organizations, this
is going to be a pretty big mind shift
because the boards, I think, a lot of
times put this downward pressure on the
CEO and the development folks just to
find that one big, you know, unicorn.
Um, and we tend to do that even in
American business. you know, you just
need that one big department store chain
to buy your widgets or you just need
that one big sale as opposed to breaking
it down. So, it it's it's not so easy to
get everybody on the bus with this
concept, is it?
>> Right. And I'm not saying you don't want
a big fun because
right, but you want to be intentional.
You want to say, okay, we've got this
big fun, we just can't assume it's going
to be forever. So how can we in addition
to this funer, how can we diversify our
funding streams? How can we make sure
that our impact is spread amongst
differenti constituents? How can we have
some fee for service? You know, it's
actually just like in your retirement
fund. You're not going to put everything
into one company's stock. You're going
to diversify your investments the same
way you want to do that with your
nonprofit funding.
>> Yeah. I I love that you brought this up
because again,
you know, for for boards, they might not
understand this and so that is a red
flag that you kind of need to educate up
on, I think, a little bit. Um, okay. So
then go, let's go to the the red flag
number five. And and this might take a
little bit more time um and an
explanation. We're going to be talking
about the lack of liquidity and then how
you analyze this and and why you should
analyze it. What are you seeing here,
Deanna?
>> So, this is basically just saying where
where are you liquid or not? Where is
your cash and analyzing that cash to
make sure that it's not just a like a
mountain in and you're going to have
this valley. You have to track your cash
over time. How much days cash do you
have on hand and project that into the
future? What do what do you think that
that cash is going to look like if
everything goes to plan? What's going to
happen if things don't go to plan? So
this is where we typically bring in some
scenario analysis and then bring that
back to cash so that the board and
management can really see not just where
like how much cash is in the bank right
now but really understand the usefulness
of that cash and what that can do for
the organization. So if first of all if
no one else gave you your organization
anything right you kind of have this
cliff of funding how many days could you
sustain your organization without having
to shut your doors so that's kind of
what we say about what are your days
cash on hand or your cash runway. I've
heard different organizations call it
different things. Then you take that and
forecast it out and kind of see, okay,
at my lowest point of the year, every
organization has some seasonality, so
they know, okay, in June, that's when I
have the least cash. What is my cash
projecting to right now in that lowest
amount? And how can I get ahead of the
game to make sure that I have enough
cash to be sustainable even through
those low times?
Okay. So, let that I think is a really
interesting concept and I think it's
really important. Let me move to like
some of the structural aspects of this
discussion today because I've served on
boards where we had like rockstar, you
know, finance committees who were people
from the industry that really could do
all this heavy lifting and then they
would be able to report back and and I
will say I'll I'll woman up and say a
lot of times I was like, "Oh yeah, the
experts are taking care of it and I
wouldn't really pay attention because it
wasn't my strong suit of why I was
serving on a board. But then I've been
on other organizations that didn't have
that and this bulk
of responsibility
fell to the general board. And it seems
like we're not spending enough time on
these red flags are important, but how
many of us can honestly say, "Yeah, we
understand that this is a red flag." So
long story short, how should we be
thinking about this? Because it seems to
me, Deiana, these five topics could be
just one board meeting.
>> Exactly.
>> I mean, I think
>> is that fair?
>> It is fair. So at the beginning of the
year or when a board member comes on
board, board orientation explaining what
we watch, explaining these are the red
flags that we're always looking at and
then basically structuring your report,
your board report around the different
KPIs or key performance indicators
against either these red flags or maybe
there's one or two additional red flags
that your organization has so that every
single month you're touching on each
individual one and it's not going to
take up the entire board meeting if
everyone understands why you're watch
why you're watching these things and how
it can really affect the impact and the
sustainability of the organization.
>> Yeah. Okay. So, this is really
interesting because prior to this
conversation, I didn't think of it that
way. I didn't think of as saying these
five flags are like the the things that
we're watching the bar and that. So, I
love that this makes this these five red
flags more digestible to me because it
becomes a habit. What I hear you saying
is that, okay, we're gonna we're always
going to know that when we're being
reported to these are the things that
that we're watching. That's a really
that's a pretty that's a pretty
different thing than I think that most
boards do.
>> Get that feedback.
I mean, with the surplus budget, you're
looking that annually, but now you
already have a surplus budget, not a
deficit. With your strategic planning,
you're thinking through how what that
looks like for big picture budget. But
then when you're talking about the other
things, we're talking about timely
financials. Well, you have to have that
every single year or every single month.
And then when you're looking at the
liquidity, you know, that's one of those
KPIs. You also might have a couple of
different diversific like funding
diversification maybe that's what is the
percentage of you know our highest five
funders what is that percentage of our
revenue and you can have that as a KPI
so it's all about and then watching your
unrestricted reserves on a regular basis
it's those specific KPIs that you can
watch every single month and as long as
the board knows what you're talking
about because you've educated them then
everyone's staying on top of things as
opposed to just reliance on one
treasurer to do all of it,
>> right? It also makes me think too that
for a finance department if they know
every board meeting um they're going to
have to report out and it can be as
simple as you know a a paragraph
narrative on these five topics then you
don't just sit around and go well what's
going to happen what information is
going to flow right I mean I can see
where this becomes part of a really
healthy habit for a nonprofit board to
have generative discussion
and and not be shocked by certain
things.
>> Right. Exactly. Because if they're
seeing where everybody is, where the
organization is at on these key items
>> Yeah.
>> throughout the year, it's not a surprise
when you get to the the end of the year
and you go, "Oh, well, I don't know if
we're going to be able to cover payroll
because our cash has been dwindling."
And then it becomes a surprise because
the board hasn't seen financials for six
months. I mean, it's these types of
things that we see sometimes in the
nonprofit sector.
>> Wow. This has been riveting. I I loved
your approach, Deanna, and it's not it's
not where I thought we'd be going today.
I think it's really really interesting
and it kind of calmed me down a bit
because then it seems like every month,
okay team, these are the five things
that we need to know in order to be
strong fiduciary leaders of this
nonprofit.
This is how we're going to roll. Um,
very very brilliant Deanna Peterson.
Wow. I it's just been a pleasure
personally to see you grow and your
expertise within your part-time
controller. U Deanna Peterson is the
nonprofit specializations director and
um as she mentioned working with 19
different sides of the nonprofit sector
um has been a fascinating thing to to
witness and we're just delighted that
you've joined us. Thank you.
>> Thank you so much, Julia. I always love
being here.
>> Yeah, it's really fun. It's I always
learn so much from you and um I love the
way that you take what should be going
on in the finance department, let me
just say finance world and then pull it
back through the organization because
it's not enough just to be like yay team
finance department get cracking. It's
got to flow through the rest of the
organization and you always seem to wrap
that up for me Diana. So thank you.
Awesome.
>> Been a lot of fun. So, this is nonprofit
power week and we have some really cool
um shows and guests. Um we're going to
be talking about everything from AI to,
you know, the people that you work with,
the questions that you should be asking
your finance team, and then we're going
to even be talking about software.
There's so so many times we get all
bogged down and then we're like, well,
we just need to change the software. And
it's like, maybe not. maybe we need to
think about how we're using it. So, join
us every day this week um because I
think you'll find great conversations
and great ideas and tips that you can
really dig in with your nonprofit team.
You don't have to be a financial expert
to uh know these things or learn about
these things, but and and I think that's
what's so key about this week is that
we're kind of looking at how just the
normal person working in the nonprofit
sector can be thinking about this. So
super super important. Hey, you know
who's what's also super important are
the people that join us each and every
week. We just passed our 1,600 episode
two weeks ago and we did that because we
have amazing partners. They include
Bloomerang, American Nonprofit Academy,
Staffing Boutique, JMT Consulting, Third
Sector Company, of course, our friends
at your part-time controller, and
Martis. These are the folks that join us
day in and day out. As we end this very
special week, nonprofit power week, with
our friends at YPTC,
we end with this message like we do
every day. And it goes like this. To
stay well so you can do well.