Video summary
The video discusses a list of twenty-two proposed changes designed to fix perceived flaws within the NBA, ranging from practical administrative adjustments to completely absurd concepts. The speaker begins by addressing more reasonable suggestions, such as simplifying pick protections in the draft lottery to prevent teams from misleading fans about their assets, and abolishing the luxury tax aprons. The argument against aprons is that they force championship-winning teams to dismantle their rosters immediately after a title win to avoid penalties, which disrupts team building and erodes historic rivalries. Other moderate ideas include maintaining the Eastern and Western conference structure to ensure competitive balance in the playoffs, banning intentional fouling to improve the viewing experience, and bringing back the pre-draft era where high school players could enter the league directly without a mandatory college year.
As the list progresses into more extreme territory, the speaker evaluates ideas like making the four worst teams play for the number one pick, which is rejected because it would incentivize tanking even more aggressively. The discussion also covers the implementation of an NBA Red Zone channel, a concept similar to MLB's coverage model that allows fans to watch multiple games simultaneously; while acknowledged as a great idea in theory, the speaker notes that complex broadcasting rights deals make it difficult to execute. Other suggestions include giving team owners a ten-year window before they can be forced to sell if they fail to engage with their fanbase, bringing back traditional home and away jerseys to restore visual identity, and introducing secret trades to keep offseason rumors exciting. The video also touches on the idea of having one retired player per team for a farewell tour season, though the speaker humorously questions how old a player could get before this becomes impossible.
The final segment of the summary explores the most outlandish proposals intended purely for entertainment value. These include making all trades secret until game day to create surprise lineup changes, allowing each team to customize their court dimensions and three-point line distances, awarding extra points for "cool shots" or dunks, and adding a sixteenth bench spot reserved for famous celebrities like Jack Nicholson or Eminem. The speaker also jokes about shortening the entire league by six inches to accommodate these eccentric ideas. Ultimately, while the speaker admits that many of these later suggestions are unrealistic and would never happen in reality, he concludes that the exercise was fun and encourages viewers to read the full article from The Ringer for a deeper dive into these increasingly unhinged concepts.
Read the full video transcript
The staff over at the Ringer put
together an article CALLED 22
INCREASINGLY UNHINGED WAYS to fix the
NBA. We love the NBA. Uh it is my
favorite league of all of the major
sports leagues, but we have to admit
that there are some flaws within our
league. And I wonder if the team over at
the Ringer has all the answers of how we
can make this a perfect league. Now,
they do say increasingly enhanced,
right? So, these first couple shouldn't
be that crazy, but by by the time we get
to to idea number 22, I'm expecting to
have to think for 30 minutes on whether
or not I like this. So, the first one
is, wait, these are actually good ideas.
This from Rob Mahoney that says, "Get
rid of pick protections." Heard this
quite some time. Um, and I'm sure this
just comes from the fact that pick
protections have become crazier as years
go on. We've got picks that are like
best swaps, worst swaps between four
different teams. If it lands 1 through
five, it's here. If it's 6 through 11,
it's here. If it's 12 through 13, it's
just it it it becomes crazy, right? And
these these organizations be trying to
trick their fan bases when they trade
away their best players. Say, "Hey, we
got three picks." when the reality is
they they they don't. They may got one
pick and then two swaps that will never
convey, but the the article or the the
tweet that Sham's put out there make it
seem like you got three first round
picks, but you don't. So, I probably
wouldn't get rid of pick protections. I
probably would just simplify how you can
protect them. either you you give up a
first rounder like completely or it's
like lottery protector or number one
protected or something like like that
where it's only a couple different ways
you can protect a pick instead of doing
it where yeah we going to keep it if
it's one through six and if it's if it's
seven through eight you get it but if
it's nine through 13 it's us again like
that's that's that's crazy not a bad uh
idea Rob number two abolish the cap
aprons yeah I mean if there's one
potentially positive thing about the
aprons and I don't even know if the
aprons should get full credit for this
is that we do live in the most parody
that we've ever really had, right? Um
teams will win a championship and
because the aprons and because everybody
gets paid after the championship
traditionally, right? You you increase
your market value once you were really
important in a game six of NBA finals,
teams come off a championship say,
"Damn, we can't really afford to keep
this team." Right? I mean, I think about
just OKC who won just not this year's
championship, but the year before that
they won a championship. They were super
young and boom, now Aaron Wiggas is
gone. Isaiah Joe's gone. Now Ludor is
gone. And while those guys, at least the
first two, may not have contributed a
ton come postseason in their
championship run, they had to get rid of
them because they were afraid of these
aprons, right? Um, a team like the
Denver Nuggets who come off a
championship and just a year after that
has to or two years after have to trade
Michael Porter Jr. and get a player in
Cam Johnson and then they they they make
some interesting decisions on who to pay
and when to pay them and just like that
because the aprons their team looks
completely different just a few years
ago. And while there another positive
could be for like a content creator like
myself, you do get it where like the
Boston Celtics traded Jaylen Brown
because they wanted more flexibility to
avoid April. Like that's kind of fun as
a content creator because I can say,
"Hey, here's a video where Jaylen Brown
got traded that gets half a million
views." But it does change team building
to the place where you can't really say
for certain if somebody's going to be on
your team for five years or two years or
one year. And it also does change get
rid of kind of like rivalries. Now the
NBA is not a place that has a ton of
them, but the ones that we had in in in
history was like, "Oh, these two teams
have had the exact same starting lineup
for three years. They've seen each other
in the first round conference finals and
the second round of those three years."
And but they they keep going headtohead.
Now look at last year's team versus this
year's team. Like damn, that team made
to the conference finals. They traded
everybody, you know? So the aprons
really do do hurt that. So I'm I'm in
favor of this idea. Um number three,
lose Oh, lose the conferences. Cool. The
Eastern Western Conferences have existed
in the NBA since the start of the 7071
season. It's tradition. I'm not reading
all this. I don't like the idea of
getting rid of the conferences, man.
Especially now, like when it was where
the Western Conference was so dominant
like for 10 years straight, you like,
"Yeah, man. That East don't stand a
chance. It's really just LeBron coming
out of the East every single year. Maybe
if we divvied it up and made it
conference list, then maybe the both
sides of the bracket could be
interesting." But now, at least going
into this season, I think both sides of
the bracket is gonna be insane. And I
think the battle for the top 10 seeds,
top eight seeds in both conferences is
going to be leaked. So I don't want to
get rid of the conferences at all. I
think this is the wrong time for that
one. Next one. Make the four worst teams
play for the number one pick. I can't
say I agree with this one. I think it is
pretty a pretty fun idea to have some
type of some type of tournament while
the the real teams the the championship
caliber teams are playing in the
playoffs. Then we got the worst offs on
the other side for the first pick. But
this just crazily incentivizes tanking
to the the third degree where like I'm
gonna try my very best to lose as many
games as possible so I can get into that
battle for the first overall pick, you
know. And this is again we we talk about
the changing of the lottery odd system.
This could be the year where we get no
tanking. I put in that quotation marks.
No no tanking, no true tanking. And this
rule right here will bring back tanking
to to the highest level. So, I can't I
can't really say I like this too much
because then what's stopping the
Washington Wizards who again got AJ
Devonte, so it doesn't matter. What's
stopping the Washington Wizards for
having one of the top the bottom four
records in the regular season and then
like the last week of the season, oh my
goodness, Trey Young and Anthony Davis
are healthy now and then they go into
that four team tournament and dominate
because they got two allstar they got
two all-star players that didn't play
this season but they're ready for this
tournament. So, yeah, I I don't I don't
really like that idea. Um, number five,
Ben intentional foul in the hacker
shack. Sure. It's not one of those
things that's too much of a problem. If
you ask me in the NBA, you do get the
times where you do get, you know, the
Mitchell Robinsons of the world and the
NBA finals, you're like, "Golly, we at
the free throw line again." And that
kind of changes the viewing experience
for us at home. But it's not something
that's ran as often as maybe it was 10,
15 years ago. So, I'm okay if we just we
keep it. Ban intentionally fouling
though. So, that Oh, so he's they're
talking about like completely, you know,
we played the foul game at the end of
the games.
H I as you know 30 seconds of basketball
time can turn into 20 minutes of real
life time because of intentionally
fouling and free throws and stuff. And
obviously the viewing experience of that
can be trash. But how cool is it when
intentionally fouling works? You're down
by two, you intentionally foul and that
person splits them at the free throw
line and now you're down by three with
ball and now you hit a three-pointer to
go to overtime. Pretty cool stuff. Now,
if you get rid of intentionally fouling
and there's 13 seconds left, the team
with the ball basically just won the
game because they could just as long as
they get it up half court, what are you
what are you going to do? You going
they're not going to pass it. You're not
going to force them to take a shot till
13 seconds left. So, I I'm N we're good.
We're good. We're good. Um shorten the
games, the season, and the load.
I don't love the idea of shortening the
NBA season whatsoever. I understand why
it would be beneficial. I mean, if you
look at it right here, the picture that
they're using is Terres Hallebertton.
Tyresce Hallebertton was coming off that
what calf injury and then went into the
playoffs and knew the risk and he went
in there in game seven. He tore Achilles
and you see this from Damen Lillard,
too, who was dealing with some type of
hamstring. I think it was may have been
hamstring injury. He he rushed his way
back and then he also tore Achilles and
they would say, "Hey, the wear and tear
on our guys is causing us to have this
increased level of injury, which I'm not
a doctor. I'm not one of the people that
keeps track of this, but that makes
sense to me." The problem I have with
shortening the games, which is like
they're talking about instead of it
being a 48m minute game, it's now a
40-minute game because that works in
college. Or shortening the season where
instead of it being an 82 game season,
it's now I mean they mentioned right
here the WBA plays 44 games. So shorten
it tremendously. I'm not a
traditionalist in any term of the word
when it comes to the NBA. But I do love
records and the idea of records being
broken. Can you imagine if we go from 48
minutes to a 40minute game? How every
goes down? The idea of somebody scoring
101 points goes down or you get rid of a
82 game season in favor for a 72g game
season. You're like, damn, now total
points are going to go down season
across season and and Braun got a lead
over everybody when it comes to these
total points. You shorten that season,
Braun's total points in NBA career is
going to be an unbeatable record. And
right now it kind of does feel like
that. The man's been all NBA player 23
years. But like the idea that those
records become completely completely
untouchable, I hate the idea of that. I
think the simple recipe for this outside
of shortening the season cuz I think
logically speaking, shortening the
season to 72 games makes too. It makes
sense. Let's be real. But it's
unrealistic because of the money that's
involved and the ads is being sold and
the owners and all of that. What makes
the most sense if we want to keep 82 but
also one to the to shorten the load as
Kurt um Goldsbury says and you have to
get the NBA players to buy into this is
elongate the season right so now this
this goes into the offseason of players
and maybe they won't agree with this
either but maybe starting the season two
weeks earlier ending the season two
weeks later and now that eliminates as
many two games and three nights or three
games and four night opportunity things
that you see but I don't know again I'm
not a traditionalist but I I love the
idea of records potentially being broken
And if we shorten the season and if we
shorten the amount of minutes per game,
a lot of that stuff goes out of the way.
And am I I guess I'm not willing to
sacrifice health from these players in
order to get rid of that. Maybe I'm I'm
the selfish one here. I'm selfish. I
want I want all of them to play 82 games
plus, you know, win 16 games in the
postseason to get the NBA championship.
Number seven, bring back prep to pro
era. No notes. I I think that if AJ
Debons was coming out of high school and
some team wanted to draft him number one
or number two or number 12, he should
have been able to go straight to the
league. I I understand the idea of one
year after preps before you turn pro. I
think it has done some interesting stuff
for the for the college game. Maybe it
won't be as black and white nowadays
because of NIL. And I think that's maybe
the point Danny is making right here
where like maybe AJ De Broner still goes
to college because of the bag that he
got from BYU. But I I think that if if
somebody is willing to employ you at 18
and you want to take that job, you
should be able to take that job, you
know? So, bring bring it back because
it's not it's not as like I don't know
guar not a guarantee that the guy that
you draft out of high school is going to
be it. think like you of course you got
your bronze of the league and Dwight
Howard like guys that immediately went
in and become DPOS and NBA MVPs and Hall
of Famers and stuff but you also got
your the saga deops of the world where
like we just going we just going to
draft a high school guy because we think
he could be it and you're going to miss
and and I feel like there's not a ton of
crazy things happen in an NBA draft
anymore having prep the pros come back
you will see a 17-year-old guy get
drafted number 10 and he's going to be
ass and and wow I hope that doesn't end
up happening to my team. I think it's
it's funny. I don't know. I think it's
funny. All right, so we're in part two.
You want to get nuts? Let's get nuts.
Number eight, get rid of instant replay
entirely. Oh my god. We can all agree
that the refs going to that damn monitor
and this thing that this the fans be or
the players be doing after every foul is
annoying as hell. I don't think we
should get rid of instant replay
entirely. I think it is a very simple
solution. If you go to the monitor and
you can't make a decision within like
two minutes, then the call stands. Give
a shot clock to the referees and if they
can't determine it or the people in
Sakus, right? Isn't that where they at?
Sakus can't figure it out in two
minutes. Ball up top. You know, we could
we can't have 10-minute reviews anymore.
I don't care if it is the NBA Finals
game seven. You get a twominute window
to figure it out. And if you don't, then
the initial call stands. Finally bring
one to NBA All-Star weekend. No notes.
It's just a matter of can we convince
the top end level players to actually do
it. I don't know the answer to that. I
know like guys like Kyrie Irving have
said they would do and maybe Kyrie is
the guy that could get it all going. Um
but I also think it's an event that of
course we benefit from having true
allstar level players in there. Some of
these role players in the league as
y'all know are just buckets. Like go
into an open run and don't miss. So can
you imagine? Let me let me think of let
me think of like like Lonnie Walker the
fourth. Lonnie Walker the fourth just
spent the year overseas and now he's
back with the Denver Nuggets, right?
Right. I think it's the Denver Nuggets.
You put him in a one-on-one competition,
he he's going to don, you know, so maybe
it gives an opportunity for some of the
role players to say, "Look, I could do
this, but I adjusted my role to be in
the NBA." So 100% no notes. Bring this
to the NBA All-Star weekend. Let's make
it work. But I think the first year has
to be Allstars to get people excited and
then maybe fall off after that because
somebody's gonna get embarrassed and
they're gonna be like, "Oh, I'm not
doing that again." Number 10, introduce
NBA red zone rim, Kobe Payne. Let me
tell y'all, I have had the luxury over
the last couple years to be in a lot of
meetings with a lot of big companies
just pitching my brand and pitching
myself. I have brought up the idea of
NBA Red Zone a thousand times in these
meetings and I think NBA TV did
something similar. It was called um was
it game time or something? They did
something similar and every time I bring
it up in the meetings, the main response
is basically it is a great idea. It is
just the execution part is the toughest
part of it all right between all the
different partners. You have to get
every single partner to agree to allow,
let's say it is NBA TV, to allow NBA TV
to broadcast these rights because it
might be a 10ame slate and one of those
games is on Amazon. You have to get
Amazon to agree to allow you to use that
game for Red Zone and I don't know if
they'd be willing to do that. So, it's
just too many moving pieces to make it
work. But I promise you, I've been in
the meetings pitching and I of course
I'm pitching myself to be the host, but
I even been saying like, "Hey, I ain't
even got to be the host. I KNOW
SOMEBODY'S GOT TO get this done and get
it done well." Um um MLB Network has
their own version of this. It's amazing.
Of course, Red Zone is the greatest
piece of media of all time. You know,
it's 13 football games on right
now. I can't watch them all. Give me the
Bears on the big screen, the Reds on the
small screen, so I can see if my fantasy
team is doing good. It is perfect. And
yes, the the NFL is the better league
for an idea like this because there's so
many stoppages of play and you can flip
between this channel and this channel,
never miss a real play, and the NBA is a
lot different than that. There is a
world in my opinion where an NBA red
zone can work. I pitched it. I' I swear
I've been in I pitched them damn
meetings, y'all. And it's just it's just
tough to to make it happen
realistically. Um I even pitched like
Okay, this is pre-Amazon. This is
preNBC. So this is what two years ago at
this point. Um when it was only
basically Turner/ ESPN or Turner and
ESPN as the major rights owners and then
you got all the local broadcastings that
I'm like, bro, don't even include the
ESPN game. If we have seven games on,
yes, the ESPN game might be the best one
because it's LeBron versus Kevin Durant.
There are NBA fans that would want the
smaller version. It's just like I said,
I wanted my Bears on my big screen and
then all the other games on red zone.
You can you can put Kevin Durant and
LeBron versus LeBron James on your
normal monitor and then if you want to
see the Charlotte Hornets versus the
Cleveland Cavaliers,
put that on a small monitor and let
Kitty Beach be the narrator and bring
you in and out of these games. I've
tried it, bro. It's just not something I
feel like is going to really work. Um,
crunch time is what what they try.
That's what's called the NBA actually
tried this before NBA crunch time. By
researching this, found many people was
confused on what it was, where it
errored and whether it exists. Uh, maybe
uh so I just I don't know. Somehow these
videos that I make here gets a wider
reach. So maybe one of them executives
that I talked to is now watching this
and saying, "Oh my god, Kenny Beach,
maybe you got another good idea." It's
not my idea. It's not my idea. I just
want to be the one executing. [laughter]
I will move to your city. straight up
move to your city. All right, number 11.
Give owners a 10ear limit. How are you
cooking? What up, Beck? You know I got
love for you. Um 100% something I've
been pitching for a long time. Not
obviously not to anybody, but I
mentioned on on the podcast many times.
There is a league in Germany, if I'm not
mistaken, a football/s soccer league in
Germany that basically has this where
like if you're an owner of this this
club, you have a window to to do the
right thing and to get fans excited. And
if you don't do that, then you get your
ass out of there. It is so crazy that we
put on these hats, we put on these
jerseys, and we root for these teams,
but the reality is these owners have so
much power and control, and they can be
at their job, and we just are
sitting here like, "Oh my god, what am I
supposed to I'm a Clippers fan today.
What am I supposed to do?" Because Steve
Bum and them was tripping and now I got
10 years where I can't do anything. The
Bulls
so great for the 90s. The Rintor family
done a good thing since they they lucked
out to get Derrick Rose and we got to
the conference finals once, but golly,
what else? So, if you have it where
there's a 10-year window and you let the
fans decide after that 10-ear window,
can Jerry keep this team or he be forced
to sell? Will he get will he get forced
to put it on the open market and then
now we get to the point where we have 30
owners that care about the fan base
that's more than just money hungry,
which is they're billionaires at the end
of the day, right? I mean, they're going
to be money hungry, but like people that
actually care. Like, say what you want.
[laughter]
I'm going to give this guy a compliment.
Say what you want about Matt Ishbium and
how crazy his decision-m has been since
he became the owner of the Phoenix Suns.
He cares about that franchise. He's like
a no stone unturned type of guy. So much
so he gave up the whole future for Kevin
Rant to win a playoff. Did they win a
playoff series together? I don't know.
But he came in and he tried it and that
didn't work out. So he traded away and
now defending Suns last year were
surprised team and he gave up a 2031
first round pick to get Miles Bridges
for the reason. But like he came
in, he said, "I care." You know, I think
he made it so that it's it's free to
broadcast if you're in Phoenix area. You
get a free antenna. And then there was
like some benefits for the workers in in
the Phoenix Suns arena and stuff. So
like, wow. It's well, he's a
billionaire. You know what I'm saying?
You got to tread Waters likely care. But
there are people out there that would be
willing to own a franchise and try to
put the franchise before everything. 10
year 10ear window. And then you got it
where like these these ownership groups
can like be thinking the Bulls are on
year number eight. The Bulls on year
number eight and I know them fans is not
gonna feel good. So now we got two years
to figure out if we want to put offer
because we know that they going they not
going to renew Jerry Risdorf's contract.
You feel me? Give them a window. Damn
it. This makes too much sense. I mean
there's probably the money reasons why
they won't make it happen. And of course
Adam Silver is an employee of the
owners. So the owners would have to be
the ones to say good idea. You're going
to fire me in four year. No, they they
would never do that. So, yeah. Um, bring
back home and away jerseys. Sure, I
don't mind it. I mean, I've never really
been a jersey guy. Like, I as growing
up, I didn't have a ton of jerseys. I I
understand the appeal of having them and
and how important they can be to a
franchise where they mention like Celtic
screen in the 80s or the 90s Bulls. I
I'm not I don't really care. I'm sure
they saying like, "Yeah, the white team
or the home team wears this color, the
white team wear this color." Nowadays,
you can wear your home jersey and your
road jersey on backto-back games and it
don't matter. Um, fix the NBA aesthetic
problem. Okay, let's see what Raheem is
talking about here. Um, I'm with Jomie.
Okay, so this person that that brought
in the home and away jerseys, but let me
take it one step further. The NBA has a
visual identity problem since Nike took
over the exclusive provide of onc court
uniforms in the 1718 in 1718 turn the
NBA game has truly become a perplexing
experience despite decades of
established brand identity. Ah, you now
see the Pistons wearing green, the
Warriors wearing white and brown, the
Cavaliers wearing bright orange, the
Grizzlies wearing red, and even the most
egregious, the Chicago Bulls, who are
some of the most iconic jersey uniforms
in the history of the sport, wearing
white and gold. I mean, yes and no. I
mean, that jersey sucked in the first.
No disrespect to the people that
designed it, but they wore it like three
times. I don't really care about that.
Um, stop trying to profit from the
gimmick. I think that's going directly
against Huh. I don't really have an
opinion on that one. Um, next we get the
and we've lost control of the exercise.
So, these are the craziest craziest
ideas and there's seven of them. All
trades are secret trades. [laughter]
All right. Obviously, we know that these
ideas are not great, but it's they're
basically saying like this is
Royal WWF WWE Royal Rumble where it's
the first it's the beginning of the
season and it's like oh my god, Jaylen
Brown is in the start lineup for who?
What? [laughter] What? Obviously, that
kills all offseason talk. Um, but it
does open up the idea and obviously
these are no these now we get to the
point where these ideas are literally
never going to happen. But now we let's
just have fun with it. Um, it does open
up the opportunity for like us fans to
be detectives and be like there there's
a private jet flying from Boston to to
Philly. You're like, "Huh, who could be
on that jet?" And there's one going from
Philly to Boston.
They must have they must have traded
Peyton PRITCHARD AND BOOM. IT'S
[laughter] LIKE, OH MY GOD, UM, DID PAUL
GEORGE now plays on this stage? You
know, that's that is kind of funny. They
use the Luca Dantis trade as an example.
Yes, bro. Can you imagine? Again, there
there's no way we knew that this trade
happened. Lakers play again. I forget
who they played against that first game
with Luca. I forget Luca first game and
it's like starting lineup for the LA
Lakers, Edgar, Luca Donic. You like what
the what the what just Anyway, that's
that's funny. Uh, the next one. Why? Why
Jeff? Every team gets a roster for one
retired player. Okay, let me think.
Who's the retired player for the Chicago
Bulls? Todd Gibson. He's not retired.
The brother's still hooping as far as I
know. Uh, one retired player. Uh,
[laughter]
still this is like the one year where
Dwayne Wade and Dirk both made Allstars
in their last year because their
farewell tour. This is basically a NBA
regular season version of that. I wonder
how old can you get? Can you get Charles
Oakley to wear an NBA? I know him and
his relationship with the Knicks have
kind of wavered over the last couple
years, but can you get him in a Knicks
jersey at 60? Can you get Michael Jordan
to come out of retirement to play for
the Bulls? He's just at the end of the
bench collecting a check and and and
look what is what does he look like in a
jersey nowadays? How about side note,
never say how do how do coaches wear
jerseys too like baseball teams pick
their own three-point line. This is so
left field. I wish there was a I tried
to do something like this in 2K once
where like you know baseball fields have
the you have the short porch with the
Yankees or you have the the Ivory or the
the Green I what the is it called?
The I'm a White Sox fan not a Cubs fan
by the way where the the the stuff on
the wall over there in Wrigley. Um and
they're just saying let's customize our
own courts. We're like, of course you
could, if I make my three-pointer 22
feet, yes, Steph Curry gonna come into
my arena and break my record, break,
break all the records. But also, we can
benefit from it because we play here 41
times out of the year. That could be
funny. But also, I'm sure teams some
teams get rid of the corner three
completely. So PJ Tucker now is an
unvaluable NBA player. Once you once you
come to our our city in 2021, PJ Tucker
can't play cuz there's no corner
three-pointer anymore. Matter of fact,
our team, we What's the wor What was the
worst three-point shooter team off off
RIP last year? Whatever that team was.
We actually don't even have a
three-point line, baby. Let's say you
beat us with all tools. Start awarding
extra points for cool shots. Only in the
only in the schoolyard is this cool. Um,
and who who is the person that decides
to cool shot? We already take 30 minutes
for replays. Imagine if referee had to
review and be like, "Ah, that was a cool
one. He did switch his hand midair.
Instead of two points, it's three. I
who who is the player that benefits the
most from cool shots? That's the
conversation. Who is the player that you
signed for max contract because he's got
cool shots and now them shots is worth
four points instead of two. Make dunks
worth three points. Oh my god, Rudy
Goar, get ready to average 20, big
fella. Get ready to average 26, big
fella. You got LaMelo Ball on your team
and it's worth three points nowadays.
Golly, you about to go crazy. Uh, this
is an idea that was experimented with in
some very small basketball league. They
didn't have the athletes of the NBA. Uh,
it's interesting. Make buzzer beater
dunks worth even more. I just How many
buzz ducks do we see? We get the Valley
oop all those years back. Um, but okay,
21 is 17 points. Okay, let's get into
it. add a 16th spot on NBA benches to
give to a f
me spikely. Uh uh uh uh Jack Nicholson.
Um
uh damn it. Uh Eminem. Clipper Daryl. Is
Clipper Daryl still a Clippers fan? I
think he left Clipper Fandle for a
little bit and then came back. Who Who
are some more famous famous fans? Oh, I
put myself in that. That's That's a
tough look. Uh yeah. down. I wouldn't I
would, for what it's worth, I can't
accept that. I got kids. I can't travel
with the NBA team to sit on the bench in
the Can you imagine me in a in a Chicago
Bulls jersey sitting next to I don't
know, Nicholas Claxton, 6'10, 6' 11, I'm
5 foot 7, 145. I'm I'mma look crazy. And
I'm like three years older than him.
I'mma look crazy out there. So, no, I
wouldn't be excited for this personally,
but I do like the idea. And what if that
player comes into the game and scores?
That's a 10-point bucket. Let's make
Let's make some fun of it. Uh, make
everything in the NBA six inches short,
eight inches shorter.
Um,
huh.
Well, shout out to the team at the
Ringer. That was fun. At the end of the
day, whether not whether you agree or
disagree with some of these ideas, you
can say it was fun. Shout out to them.
I'll put the link in description if you
want to read it because again, we just
skim through it. Uh, shout out to them.
Happy winner.