137. Beyond the Interface: Dreamforce, the SaaSpocalypse, and Who Owns the AI Production Stack
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The episode centers on the transformative impact of Dreamforce and the emerging "SaaS apocalypse," a concept describing how Salesforce is fundamentally restructuring its business model by betting the company on AI agents rather than just traditional software interfaces. Hosts John and Dave discuss how Salesforce, under CEO Benioff, has evolved from a collection of disparate acquisitions into a cohesive "System of Intelligence." A key takeaway is the rise of "headless" architecture, where AI agents can generate user interfaces dynamically without relying on native Salesforce screens. This shift allows data partners like Qualitate to inject process knowledge and harmonize data across various client surfaces, effectively turning Salesforce into an agentic front door that manages workflows, identity, and business context while other tools handle the interface layer.
The conversation delves deep into the financial and strategic implications of this transition, challenging the narrative of a market bubble in the AI infrastructure sector. While some worry about asset prices detaching from fundamentals, the hosts argue that the current boom is driven by genuine demand for compute, chips, and data center capacity required to put models into production. The investment thesis has shifted from merely possessing the "smartest model" to owning the entire production stack, which includes physical infrastructure, networking, and sovereign AI capabilities. This reality is underscored by the IPO of NScale, a company that integrates cryptocurrency mining heritage with enterprise-grade data center services, signaling a maturing market where non-investment grade assets are being financed holistically to meet surging demand for AI compute.
Furthermore, the hosts address the critical role of open-source models and safety in this rapidly evolving landscape. They posit that while frontier models drive initial innovation, the gap between proprietary and open-source capabilities will compress over time, making open source a viable alternative rather than a stopgap. Safety and governance are not seen as brakes on progress but as essential layers integrated into the stack itself; one cannot secure what has not yet been built. The discussion highlights that the true value for enterprises lies in unlocking proprietary data through agents that learn organizational workflows, moving beyond simple chatbots to complex, autonomous operations that can handle tasks like changing flight seats or managing support lines. Ultimately, the future belongs to those who can orchestrate these composable elements—models, agents, context, and data—into a robust production environment that delivers tangible ROI, regardless of whether the underlying infrastructure is hosted on-premises or in a new cloud.
Read the full video transcript
Hello, welcome to the cube pod episode
137. I'm John for with Dave Volante. I'm
in New York City. Dave's back in the
home ranch in the Boston area.
>> I need to do it like this because I'm
redeyed.
>> I love the goatee development there.
Full beard
fisherman look. Um you just came back
from Dreamforce. Uh we had a great event
with IBM the CFO chief human resolver.
You were at Dreamforce. We had a lot of
action going on here. Just a bunch of
people this week. Gemini and the team
are just cranking away. But there's so
much going on. First, I'll start I want
to start with you because you know
Dreamforce is always a an event and
Jensen was there. Enthropic CEO was
there. Jensen made a comment. This is
the best sales conference. Kind of a
ding on Beni off. Um but um and then
Benny said we everyone's following you.
It's like walking around doing that town
hall vibe. And then uh you know Jen says
follow me and he said everyone's
following you. Um he's definitely
following Jensen obviously and then
Daario was there obviously investment
made
by them and him for anthropic anthropic
a threat as some say in the SAS
apocalypse to rewrite Salesforce. Um the
rise of Slack and the importance of
Slack. Last year we highlighted at at
Dreamforce how Slack would be great
unstructured data for things like graph.
I just came back from the Neo4j graph
talk New York City and ontologies graphs
picking up data from Slack, Gmail, new
tools like Instinct is out. You know,
you got Meta's got a new tool. So the
agents are best of times, worst of
times. What's your take on Dreamforce?
>> Well, so first of all, Beni off is the
keynote master. Um, he is very
performative. I happen to love his
style. uh great energy and he calls all
his people up whether they're customers
or employees of his and every speaker at
Dreamforce has this incredible energy uh
because they're they're trying to keep
up with Mark. So, and and you're 100%
right. Uh the the banter between Mark
and Jensen was fabulous. Jensen's got to
be the alpha. Whatever show he goes to,
he's the alpha. A couple weeks ago, we
were at CrowdStrike and he and George
Curts were kind of going at it talking
about George is talking about how he's
the young gun and Jensen was talking
about he had bigger guns, you know, so
George was, you know, but but ultimately
Jensen's the alpha. I love the way that
to your point that Mark put his arm
around Jensen and said, "Everybody's
following you, bro." And so
you get a huge sort of tip of the cap to
him. But but I I thought Dreamforce was
is actually quite amazing. And here's
why. A couple years ago, George Gilbert
did some deep research and started to
uncover how Salesforce wasn't just a
collection of Tableau and Slack and all
these other acquisitions that weren't
integrated. They were actually doing the
engineering work. And even though it was
early days, they had a vision. Mark was
allocating the the R&D and doing
investments to bring that all together
with the system of intelligence we
called it. Well, we saw that on full
display uh this week at uh at Dreamforce
and and so the other huge thing is
headless, right? Headless 360 and you
saw Claude now generates the user
interface
>> using headless. So you don't even have
to use the interface from Salesforce,
the native interface, but you can same
thing with Slack can now generate an
interface. What does that mean? the the
new data partner that we have,
Qualitate. Wait till you see this thing.
John, you've been on boarded. It's like
crack. I'm running surveys right now.
I'm running one survey on Service Now
control tower. I'm running another one
on Coreweave
to set up for our event there. Anyway,
Qual just ran a survey around agent
force you just this week. they dropped
it. And what it showed is that customers
actually expect spending to go up as a
result of headless because you're using
even though you're using another client
surface, you're actually using more data
and generating more agent activity from
Salesforce. So it could actually
escalate. The big question is pricing.
How are they going to price this thing?
Is it going to be seatbased pricing or
consumptionbased pricing or userbased
pricing? Is it going to be outcomebased
pricing? Is it going to be an ELA? and
and that's going to ultimately
determine, you know, how this thing
plays out. And I will say this last
thing is software companies are usually
really good, John, at preserving their
revenue and making sure it continues to
grow.
>> You know, I think this whole headless
thing points to the fact that AI agents
are no longer a feature cycle, meaning
agents are feature of the enterprise.
They're forcing a complete
reconstruction of the enterprise stack.
We're hearing this even here today. I
was talking to folks from Boston
consulting group and investors around
the AI infrastructures but this
enterprise stack from the applications
the end interfaces down through security
infrastructure and capital okay spending
investments and categories. So you know
your commentary and your survey kind of
reinforces that shift not just for
Dreamforce things like Splunk they had
their conference the AI infrastructure
summit that was in San Jose and all
these security issues. I mean, this is
the the industry is basically saying,
look, it we're moving too fast, but all
full steam ahead. What do you say? Damn
the torpedoes, Dave. I mean, that's your
favorite line. That's what's happening.
We got to be safety. You know, go
slower. We need to pace the frontier. I
don't think that's actually true. I
think that's a false narrative. You
know, it may be fast, but everyone's
full steam ahead and agents are getting
more autonomous at exactly the most
concerning around this noise around
safety, right? So, it just doesn't make
any sense to me because what you just
said is we're have a composable stack.
>> Yeah.
>> So, this is really not really talked
about. So what is how should people
think about this? Because half the
population thinks AI is bad.
>> Half think it's going to be great and
the half of the bad is politicized, but
also they're not in the in the no.
>> AI is going to be great and it's got the
potential to be really bad.
So both things can be true. And I think
that you know when you listen to Sachs,
oh this is all BS, you know, and you
listen to Bernie Sanders, oh we got to
stop AI, you know, the truth is probably
somewhere in the in the middle. Nobody's
ever said we don't want to govern AI.
I've never heard anybody say that. Um,
and of course there's all these
conspiracy theories, but one thing we
know for sure is that open source is not
going to stop. And so I think that, like
I say, the truth is probably somewhere
in the middle. I don't know what the
outcome is. Is it a 0% probability that
AI could do some serious damage? I would
say absolutely not. You know,
>> well, I mean, do you think do you think
we're really going to slow down AR? is
simply going to be another
>> stack component. Safety and governance
kind of go together. We covered a lot of
governance conversations. Safety just
becomes another layer of the stack in my
opinion. What what I mean it just can't
slow down.
>> You can't you can't make it safe until
you build it. And so you got to build it
first. And so you know what are you
protecting if you don't if you haven't
built it? You don't know what you're
protecting. So people say, "Well, you
got to design it in." Well, you got to
design it first. And so I don't see AI
slowing down, I I I you know, unless the
there's some external government
pressure to do it. But unless, you know,
Trump and Xi get together and say, "Hey,
let's slow this thing down." And even
then, would you trust that China's going
to slow it down? And even then, if it's
out there in the wild with open source
and open weights, you know, it's not
necessarily going to slow down. I think
the question I would have John is
collectively can the open source
community kind of match the frontier
models or do they need them I would say
it's likely they need them to lead but
will the delta between when a frontier
model comes out and the open source
matches it or roughly matches it will
that compress says it absolutely will
compress it might go from six months to
four months or from four months to two
months you know it's not going to go
from you know four months to zero
you know, but really at the end of the
day, you know, open source is pretty
close.
>> Let's talk about the um Dreamforce
real dynamic that everyone's talking
about. Salesforce is essentially betting
the company on agents. Would you agree
with that?
>> Oh yeah, they I'm wondering when they're
going to change their name.
>> Okay, so we agree. Let's just Okay, now
do you believe that you got AI Force COA
and you got the deeper integration with
AWS Google suggest they see this next
application architecture? What's your
analysis say on that architecture? Cuz
it's an interesting move to say, okay,
betting on agents is one thing. That's
clearly what they're doing. But what
does that mean? Cuz they're betting the
company. That's what's happening. What
does it mean?
>> So here's what it means. So headless
becomes that system of intelligent.
That's where the data is harmonized. The
process knowledge gets gets injected and
and and that becomes we this is really
one of the first true enterprise
harnesses that we've seen. you know, you
see harnesses within the LLMs, but
they're not deterministic. So, this is
really the first example of that AI
Force, which is what they announced,
that allows any client
uh surface to basically create the
interface. And so, I think the reality
is this stuff is is not mature. I mean,
Agent Force is still in its early days,
but there's there's clear business
value. We heard it at Dreamforce. We
heard it from the qualitate data. people
are getting, you know, improvements of
30 to 40% more uh of benefits. They're
they're they're just knocking out half
of the inbounds that are crap inbound
leads. Um you know, they're they're
agents are doing more and more calls,
you know, so you're very clearly
starting to see value there. Um the
other thing I say is that it's unclear
with spending right now. There's no
evidence that spending is shifting from
the existing sort of Salesforce budget
in into agent forces. We're not seeing
that cannibalization.
But let's face it, it's mostly early
days and it's mostly proofs of concept.
Over time, we'll see how pricing plays
out and how that affects Salesforce's
business. They did announce that they're
moving out of the 50s, 50 billion into
the 60s. You know, they upped their
projections. you know, the stock went
down quite a bit. Um, so but but the
bottom line, John, is to your point,
they now have this full agentic stack
with it's and much of it is their own,
but a lot of it to your I love that word
composable. When you think about their
relationship with like u dream uh uh uh
data bricks or snowflake, those are
composable elements that work well
within the snowflake uh the Salesforce
ecosystem. I mean, composable agents is
definitely what's what they're talking
about. What's interesting to me to your
point is that, you know, they could be
the agent interface, but they don't have
to own um every agent interface, right?
Because agents have standards, but they
have the data. So to me, you know, with
SAS with Salesforce becoming the poster
child for SAS apocalypse because they
are probably the number one example
people use if you look at it and they're
a proxy for like a workday and everybody
else, but if you if you look at what
they're doing, their advantage might be
the remaining system of data, the
workflow, the identity, then and the
business context underneath it all. And
that's why I think Slack becomes a
potential agentic front door.
unstructured data works well with crafts
works well with kind of the
infrastructure that AI likes. So it' be
very interesting to see how they develop
that. I mean that's going to be the the
the marker for me is okay how does Slack
evolve?
>> I I I think if you are here's how I
think about it. If you're using
Salesforce for not only u a system of
record but also for your workflows and
it it's deeply embedded into your
processes
>> and again the qualitate data bears this
out. It's highly likely that you're
going to do a lot more inside of
Salesforce. If however you're just using
Salesforce as the system of record and
it's not deeply embedded in your
workflows and your processes through
headless, you could actually kind of
recreate a lot of that function that
Salesforce has outside of Salesforce.
And that's where the SAS apocalypse
actually comes into play. So the the the
interesting and unknown right now is,
you know, what's that going to be?
What's that midto long-term effect? I I
think it's undeniable that they're that
that that some of that is going to you
know occur with other you know whether
it's uh harnesses claude code cursor uh
uh open AI you data bricks etc. If
developers have an affinity toward those
and Salesforce is not deeply embedded in
your organization I think it's highly
likely that some of that Salesforce data
through headless is going to be accessed
and you're going to see some siphoning
off. The question then becomes is is the
incremental business that Salesforce is
going to get in the momentum because
they're early on in this cycle. Um is
that going to offset any of that drift?
>> Yeah, the whole mode is based on the
data workflow identity and the context.
Okay, that I would say that would be a
fair statement. But we what we don't
know yet this is what I'm watching
closely because talk about the AI
infrastructure and the boom and the
agents that'll come out of that as more
computing power emerges. data. Here's a
thought exercise. Right now, the value
is the data that they have and and
that's true for most enterprises. What's
the 1% roughly of the data in the
enterprise is unlocked because OpenAI
and the frontier models haven't yet
ingested that proprietary data. But what
happens when agents start to learn about
how enterprises actually work over time?
Then you have a new training inference
data set. Okay. And so I was just
talking to someone about this um Spirit
Airlines bankruptcy. There was a bid for
the data you know 20 years of data
roughly 10 20 years worth of data of
every transaction and the the buyers of
that data were for training purposes.
Okay. So that kind of brings up the
commoditization of the system of record.
So at what point does that become
disposable?
So that's a a interesting thing because
you say, hey, the frontier model's
trained, use GPUs and Nvidia and then
inference became the killer app. Okay,
that's great. We're seeing that boom
now. But what happens in the SAS
apocalypse scenario that you're talking
about where okay, what if their
advantage is all those workflows, all
that systems of record? What if the
agents figure out how companies work,
>> right? Well,
>> exercise, but you can say given the fact
that these new tools like Instinct are
doing transactions,
changing your flight seat for you, um
using iMessage interface, WhatsApp is
saying, "Hey, you know, I don't want a
middle seat cuz I just got a boarding
pass. I got a middle seat. Change it."
And it just goes and does it and cranks
on the support line, does the does the
the work for you. That's happening right
now. I just talked to someone who had
their middle seat changed by instinct,
the new AI agent app. So that's
interesting scenario. So I am I'm going
to watch this very closely because if
this AI boom continues as we saw in the
AI infrastructure summit, chips, memory,
networking, optics, database are they're
all moving at full speed. The next step
is can they in train and infer
generically what an enterprise does
>> well and and you know Beni off
understands this well. You saw you might
have seen the Finn acquisition. So the
Finn acquisition is a standalone agent
to counter you know Brett Taylor's
company Sierra and Finn is you know it's
best to breed from an ease of use
standpoint. So so Ben off sees this
coming and so that there in lies the
Finn acquisition but the the whole point
of our breaking analysis and you just
nailed it this week John is it's called
it's titled Salesforce after Dreamforce
how CRM the company can grow beyond its
own interface. And this is the crux of
the issue. We we're seeing this evolve.
And I got a shout out to to George
Gilbert. I mean, he nailed along with
with with Jeffrey Moore for the
economist article that they're doing. He
nailed the the emerging software stack
and it's evolved, but we're now seeing
we saw it with Snowflake, we saw it with
data bricks, we're seeing it here with
Salesforce. You can certainly see the
hyperscalers, the Google and Microsoft
and even Amazon to a great extent all
coalesing around this new software
stack. It's changing right before our
eyes and Salesforce is very clearly in
the mix.
>> Yeah. And it's going to move from agents
to to me infrastructure. I mean digital
infrastructure, you're talking about
digital infrastructure at this point.
When you talk about headless systems,
composability, you're talking about
agentic infrastructure, not applications
because those will be managed or built
on the fly maybe. So, we'll see. Um, the
infrastructure boom continues. Dave,
again, the the data is coming out.
Caruso 30 almost $ 31 billion valuation.
You know, the infrastructure continues
to go. Uh,
>> we knew them when they were like less
than a billion, John. I mean, it's
>> like on nobody even heard of Cruso. I'm
not even sure they were funded yet. It
was like a gleam in his eye.
>> Post post on AI got a almost a $600
million value uh raise at a $5 billion
valuation. Series C by the way. Uh
>> no bubble. No bubble though.
>> There's no bubble. I had three here
today and I said to them, is there a
bubble? They said absolutely not. No
bubble. Brian will bust your chops. I
guarantee you're gonna get a text.
>> Brian, no bubble.
>> Enjoy it while it lasts. People,
>> for the record, guys, there's no bubble.
Dave, there's no bubble. I just
interviewed managing director of digital
bridge and I'm investing in digital
infrastructure. He said no bubble.
There's too much demand. Now, he lived
through the internet bubble and he lived
through the telecom bubble. He says
there's too much demand and the
financing of these unsecure not what was
the word um where you don't have AAA
ratings um these these these these
valuations
are not standard so people are worried
about
>> but investment he's talking about
investment grade
>> investment grade yeah non-investment
grade assets so uh and he was also an
early investor on both the core weave
rounds the two billion and the $7
billion financing and they'd looked at
it from a credit stand And he it's
interesting. He said they finance the
chips and the physical buildout. So they
got the real estate and the physical
plant as well as the chips. They they
they holistically finance both in the
analysis and again non-investment grade.
So obviously they can apply their domain
expertise. But this is kind of what's
going on. The financial community is
leaning into these um these
non-investable grade deals and make them
bankable. That's what's going on with
the NeoCloud. That's why I got to ask
you. So I'm looking up the definition.
What's the definition of a market
bubble? A market bubble is an economic
cycle where asset prices surge far above
their true intrinsic value driven by
speculation and emotion rather than real
financial fundamentals. Let's let's
actually unpack that. Well, I just told
you that the real financial people are
valuing a non-investment grade asset,
okay, as valuable and it's delivering
>> kind of like they did with housing.
>> So then it says the anatomy of a bubble
displacement.
>> Fraud fraud is different than actual.
>> Okay. But the anatomy of a bubble
displacement investors get excited about
a new technology. Boom. Prices start
rising and gain momentum as more buyers
join. Euphoria, asset prices skyrocket.
Everyone believes prices will rise
forever. There is no bubble. Uh now
profit taking profit taking hasn't
really started yet, right?
>> It's not everyone and everyone's not
running to this. It's very unique
financial market.
>> But here here's what I say though some
interesting dynamic John
>> and by the way the demand curve. The
question to ask is how big will the tide
be? It's high before we go there couple
observations. Moore's law was
deflationary. Jensen's law is actually
inflationary. He said this to Beni off.
He goes, "People are bummed out because
they they locked in forward pricing a
year ago and now they could get 30, 50,
90% higher prices." So it's actually
inflationary. The second thing I would
say is there is monetization
very clearly. SpaceX AI, the
hyperscalers, anybody who Nvidia,
anybody who has compute can monetize.
The question is, are mainstream
enterprises monetizing? And I think the
answer is some are, but most are not.
And that is the thing to watch. So, like
I I've always said, bubbles don't always
burst. Sports teams, they've been in a
30-year bubble and hasn't burst yet.
>> That's called a market.
>> I think I would call that a market.
>> Market. Yeah.
>> Okay. So, Gardner projects worldwide AI
spending growth of 49% in 2026. um the
capital spending far beyond the found is
going far beyond the foundation model.
You're starting to see different kinds
of investments and the investment thesis
is here in in Wall Street at least that
I'm observing is migrating from who has
the smartest model to who owns the
production stack. What I mean by that is
to your point about ROI and this is
where I don't think it's a bubble is
that whoever can get stuff into
production. So if I'm a Neo cloud and I
got a hundred billion dollars in orders
for offtake,
I better I got to build. So the risk
goes to can you put that into production
and service that deal or deals. Now
there's two types of deals. There's the
physical deal building the data centers.
There's risk involved there. Then
there's the chip financing. And what
Jensen was pointing out to your point is
that the chips aren't actually losing
value as much as people think. So
they're the they're creditworthy.
>> They're gaining value. They're
increasing in value. that doesn't make
it a real estate thing because the
investment thesis is migrating from who
has the smartest model to who has the
production stack and the chips and the
real estate kind of work together right
so when you look at like say for example
this came up in my last interview fiber
optic is the most commodity product on
the planet well guess what people are
acquiring land and power for put a data
center if it doesn't have fiber optic
it's dead so the fiber is becoming
valuable again so things like that
copper the price of copper high. Why?
Because they're all being used in data
centers. Well, guess who has a lot of
copper? All the telos who are ripping it
out of the ground. Their trash is now
treasure, right? So, you started to see
the asset balance sheet discussion. Um,
I don't think that looks and smells like
a bubble to me. That's demand curve. So,
the infrastructure will be interesting
to follow the money. Where's the
spending going? And what's the
investment thesis? It comes back down to
what you said like multiple pods ago
about ROI. If you don't have stuff in
production, aka data centers,
you're screwed. The data center is the
new enterprise, Dave. It's the new on
premises. So, okay. If if you believe
that to be true, then there's the unlock
of the enterprise market.
>> I think that's true.
Modeled market.
>> Well, very clearly onrem is getting an
unlock right now. You can see it with
with Dell, with HPE. Of course, a lot of
Nvidia stuff is going on prem. I'd say
that, you know, even the even the neo
clouds, even though it's not on prem, I
mean, you're seeing alternatives to
hypers scale. Uh I, you know, and this
this the narrative about the smartest
model is interesting because, you know,
the every LLM says, well, it's not about
the smartest model, and you just made
that statement, but but everybody's
trying to get the smartest model. And
like Sarah Frier is saying, the one who
has the the the best compute, the most
compute access, which Sam Alman's been
trying to lock up for years, and now,
you know, Dario is doing the same, is
going to help them get a smartest model.
I actually think smartest model still
matters. It seems to be what we're what
we're talking about because that's
what's driving the frontier. Now, the
question is, is that tail off? You know,
>> well, the investment thesis was who's
the smart, but I think everyone wants
the smartest model and then they're
going to have our power laws kicking in.
Again, back to our multi-year projection
on this one. That's true.
>> That's true. So, I'm not they're not
investing in the smartest model. They're
investing in who can do the production
stack.
>> Fair enough. But but the smartest the
smartest model is what's driving the
demand because that's what's driving the
compute.
>> Well, because the compute needs to go
into smaller footprints like the edge.
We talked about the hypercon converge
edge. Who's going to put there? It's a
chip game, not model game. Now, you have
to have a smaller model. What's the
smallest smartest model? That's not the
investment thesis. That's how do you get
it in production? How do you turn a
telecom or a headend into into a
>> fair how do you deploy it? I I agree
with that.
>> Um so you know models are becoming
specialized and embedded. I mean look at
anthropic. Um you got Salesforce COA
launch. Anthropic got the biology lab.
These are like the beyond the chatbot
era, right? Like so it's like
>> way way beyond the chatbot.
>> These are workflows. These are workflows
and domain expertise and operating
environments. That's where the AI
infrastructure production comes in. So
you to me that's the dots that connect
there.
>> Well, okay. What else you want to talk
about?
>> Well, I mean agent stack thing because
like to me, you know, um the thesis that
came out of Dreamforce, which we've been
tracking here as well, and you've been
tracking with George, is you got models,
agents, context, and data. the Neo4j
event, you know, they're all engineers,
so you can read the tea less a little
bit there. The context graphs are huge,
context layers, that's a data thing. And
then orchestration, security, and
governance, okay, and then what
infrastructures that run to put it in
production again. So if the enterprises
aren't going to be standing up, you
know, gigawatts of factories, they'll
use the neocloud. So I think the
neoclouds like Michael Dell's been
taking advantage of will be the
enterprise new data servers, right? So
the data center. So, you know, it's
there's a strong argument that these
data centers are the new enterprise
>> because they can do multi-tenant
features but give single tenant
experience for workloads.
>> That's to me the number one thing.
>> Okay. But but so tie it back to
Salesforce. So, so coming out of
Salesforce, the premise is very clear. I
mean, their next growth opportunity is
going to come from customers that
probably spend less time on the
Salesforce interface and having agents
do more of the work and and the the
we've seen a progression. Benny off
talked about this. We went from command
line to graphical user interface to web
to to mobile and now we're going to sort
of agentic creating on the fly. You're
seeing Claude create the interface.
You're seeing Slack create the
interface. virtually any harness is
going to be able to create the interface
and so so that that's going to drive
token demand. Where's that token demand
going to come from? Back to your point
core infrastructure in the data center
and a lot of that data center you ties
into Amit's uh sovereign AI stack. A lot
of that is going to be on prem. There's
no question about it.
>> Well, I want to talk about some breaking
news. I just saw CNBC have an article
just hit Nscale announcing IPO of the on
the NYSC. I was at their investor
meeting. I saw their numbers, saw their
traction. Great management team. Um it's
out there. They're going public.
>> Wow. Great.
>> On NYC. We'll be in the building. We'll
be tracking that puppy. So, they're an
example of kind of the playbook
Coreweave built, which is fully
integrated um business. Again, they came
out of the whole cryptocurrency mining
um firm that they started. Now, they
went full scale. They bought any scale
company we've been tracking with Robert
Nishimar's company. They're now in the
stack fully integrated. Um so, huge
cloud provider opportunity for this AI
infrastructure again serving
enterprises. So, you have that vertical
specialization. Then you got more of the
horizontal neo clouds. Um so, Nebius and
Cororeweave have a new competitor. Okay.
And this IPO is expected to be pretty
smashing. Um, and we'll see how this
goes. But, you know, we'll be here on
the ground. You know, I don't know. I'll
have to ask Brian Bal at the NYSC how it
all works. But I think when they flip,
they're finished through the SEC
process. They could go within weeks. So,
you know, we're September 18th,
Friday could be two weeks IPO. You'll
have to fly in Dave and check it out.
Jee and I will be certainly on the
ground doing live streaming from the
floor here. um capture all the data and
all that.
>> Do we know the date of the IPO?
>> I I don't know. I don't know. You know,
they're certainly it's the IPOs. They're
like the c I'm learning about the cage
of the IPOs. That's why I have to ask
Brian because um they could just if
they're well they got their they're if
they're buttoned up, they'll go faster.
You know how it works. Um but they're
they're stacked up. They just add a new
board member uh Fiji Simo, former
OpenAI, Instacart Meta. She's in my
friend group with Cheryl Sandberg and
PaloAlto. So you got the Cheryl Samberg
crew. Um Nick Kle, he took over comms
from Elliot Shre who was at Google with
Cheryl which we did work there with them
with the cube and Silicon Angle. So I
know them personally. They are strong
leaders. So their board is stacked with
with uh with talent. So I think this is
going to be pretty solid and the fact
that they bought any scale shows that
the management knows what they're doing
because with disagregated serving you
got to know the resource. So they they
check all my boxes, right? So I love
this company. We'll see how they do. I
mean, who knows what's going to go on
with the IPO market. It could happen.
Anything could happen. Trump could do
something in China. You never know
what's what the politics scene is. Um
but if the market stays the way it is,
it should be a smashing success.
>> So I just asked Qualitate. I mean, you
can you can ask an LLM who is Nscale.
Anybody can do that. But what's cool
about Qualitate is they have actually
have customer interviews. Now, I'm
shocked that they have an interview with
NScale, right? But it's in their system.
And then this one customer says, "We've
also looked at Ncale as a burst option
for when bad jobs spike beyond what
we've provisioned." So that's the only
customer example we have. But like I
said, right now I'm running a survey on
Coreeave, a 15N survey, and we'll see
what comes out of that. I want to get
the results ahead of our uh of our show
there. I like that mixture of expert,
you know, smaller ends, highly valuable
targeted results, and given our data on
the cube in Silicon Angle, we can
contextualize the hell out of that. So,
you know, this is interesting news,
Dave. So, again,
>> you're going to see the first
contextualization
of that uh this week in breaking
analysis that George and I did. It was
awesome. We took anybody can say what
happened at the this this at Dreamforce
that was there and anybody can do
customer surveys. The key is bringing
those two things together and putting
them in context and then of course you
know mapping him at George's system of
intelligence framework which he's just
awesome at. So you're going to see that
this weekend.
>> Well, we got a lot going on in
California at the Corv event. I'll be at
the proof point event. They're looking
at another IPO prospect. Octa Octane. Uh
we got the uh UiPath Fusion event. Uh
Meta Connect's going on virtual. Um we
have to leave. I have to leave now
because we're having a meet up. There's
a big DJ coming in here. Our room for
our big
>> just a plug. We got we have a we have an
Oracle security event um launching uh
next week. I was just out in PaloAlto
recording that with all the the big guns
SVPs. We had customers in there uh led
led by Juan Loza which was awesome. what
what they're doing in security is just
remarkable.
>> Yeah. Well, we got a lot of actually got
a lot of investors coming. Got like 60
70 people signed up. We're going to do a
little talk with Post on I AI. They got
the new chip. They got great valuation.
We got um Dmatrix coming in. Um bunch of
hot companies. So, it should be fun.
Again,
>> what's that thing that you're doing?
Aren't you speaking at some Dell event?
>> Yeah, next week I'm keynoting at the
Dell Symposium in San San Jose. Uh I
think you're going to be in town for
their New York event. Y um Michael Dell
is going to come into the NYSC.
Obviously, they're one of the the
darlings of Wall Street right now.
They're up for the year 250%
around there, give or take, depending on
how the market's down a little bit
today. So, like, okay, they're kicking
ass and taking names. So, that's good.
>> The Dell data the Dell data platform is
uh we're we're there some news coming
out there that Dell is like the hottest
company going these days. It's
unbelievable.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And so, you know, hey, good
for them. They did the right thing. They
they work with us. They we advise them.
We give them the right decisions to
make. They made good calls. They're
smart. They have the big ears open.
They're always listening to the market.
One of Michael Dell's tenants of first
principles.
>> You know who just wrote a book. Speaking
of big ears, Matt Baker.
>> Really?
>> I'm reading his book. It's unbelievable.
And this it's unbelievable what he's
sharing. He's like, uh, the book is
called Unconventional Wisdom, an
unlikely career in tech by Matt Baker. I
mean, he lays it all out there. A lot of
personal stuff, which is quite amazing.
>> What's the tell inside baseball there?
>> A lot of inside baseball. Um, it's very
cool. Obviously references Jeff Clark a
lot, Michael, Travis Vill. He talks
about his career. I mean, he's just I
didn't I mean, I've known Matt for quite
some time, but just sort of in a
business case, a business setting. You
got to check it out. Um
>> I'm definitely going to download that.
>> It's pretty amazing.
>> Is it hard copy or ebook?
>> No, I'm reading it on my Kindle.
>> Great.
>> It's it's it's wild. And I'm learning a
lot, too. I mean, he you know, he was,
you know, he's he was a tech a tech guy,
tech like it guy, which I didn't know.
And he became became the head of
strategic planning at Dell, right? He
was at Intel.
>> Um pretty cool. He went to he he
installed like remote access for for
Gordon Moore's house which you know
where that is. It's right near you know
Don's place.
>> Right near Don's place. Yeah.
>> Don's place. Yeah.
>> Yeah. They have a hard time to get
connectivity there because it's in in a
hole basically in the mountains.
>> Well Dave I run to this event
here. We'll see you next time. Cube pod.
Next one will be 138. Cranking along.
We'll see you next time. Thanks
everybody.